Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
A complex approach to ensuring robustness of measurement methods
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2018-12-8-12
Abstract
This article provides the basis of system approach to examination of robustness of measuring methods. On the base of process measuring model the model of robustness for measuring method that allows to find the entire spectrum of external and external influence factors is proposed. It emphasizes factors of robustness loss for methods of the first and second kind. It also provides the base for algorithms of the their identification, analysis and management, including application of methods of robustness process engineering G. Taguchi. The concept of complex method for examination of measuring method at the validation stage is offered.
About the Authors
P. S. Serenkov
Belarusian National Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. L. Gurevich
Belarusian State Institute of Metrology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. . Feldshtein
Head of the Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Machinery Operation, University of Zielona Góra
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Validation of analitical procedures used in the examination of pharmaceutical materials / WHO Expert committee on specifications for pharmaceutical preparations. Thirty second report. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992:117-121(WHO Technical Report Series, № 823).
2. Руководство ЕВРАХИМ/СИТАК. Количественное описание неопределённости в аналитических измерениях. Изд. 2-е / Пер. с англ. СПб.: ВНИИМ им. Д. И. Менделеева, 2002. 149 с.
3. Робастность в статистике. Подход на основе функций влияния / Под ред. Ф. Хампель. М.: Мир, 1989. 512 с.
4. Genichi Taguchi, Subir Chowdhury, Shin Taguchi. Robust Engineering: Learn How to Boost Quality While Reducing Costs & Time to Market. London: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
5. ISO 5725-5:1998. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Pt. 5: Alternative methods for the determination of the precision of a standard measurement method.
6. Genichi Taguchi, Subir Chowdhury, Yuin Wu. Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook, 2004. [Электрон. версия] http://downarchive.org/e-books/9171-taguchis-quality-engineering-handbook.html (дата обращения: 01.10.2018).
7. Серенков П. С., Жагора Н. А., Найденова В. И., Фуфаева О. В., Павлов К. А. Комбинированный подход к оценке неопределенности результата измерений в рамках внутрилабораторного исследования МВИ // Метрология и приборостроение. 2013. № 3. С. 15-23.
8. ISO/TS 21748:2010. Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation.
9. Measurement Systems Analysis. Reference Manual. Daimler Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, 2002. [Электрон. версия] http://rubymetrology.com/add_help_doc/MSA_Reference_Manual_4th_Edition.pdf (дата обращения: 01.10.2018).
Review
For citations:
Serenkov P.S., Gurevich V.L., Feldshtein E. A complex approach to ensuring robustness of measurement methods. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2018;(12):8-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2018-12-8-12
Views:
95
Email this article 