Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Разработка и исследование алгоритма обработки несогласованных данных ключевых сличений эталонов
Abstract
An algorithm for estimation of inconsistent data obtained in key comparisons of national measurement standards is suggested. The algorithm is based on the procedure of modifying the measurement uncertainties to make possible to form the multitude of metrologically compatible measurement results. The application of proposed algorithm is illustrated by the example of key CCQM-K5 comparisons data.
About the Author
Н. Бурмистрова
Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт метрологии им. Д. И. Менделеева
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Cox M. G. The evaluation of key comparison data. An introduction// Metrologia. 2002. V. 39. P. 587-588.
2. BIPM 1999. Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates issued by National Metrology Institutes (MRA) [Офиц. сайт] http://www.bipm.org (дата обращения 20.01.2014 г.).
3. Cox M. G. The evaluation of key comparison data// Metrologia. 2002. V. 39. P. 589-595.
4. Chunovkina A. G. e. a. Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases// Metrologia. 2008. V. 45. P. 211-216.
5. Lira I. Combining inconsistent data from interlaboratory comparisons // Metrologia. 2007. V. 44. P. 415-421.
6. Elster C., Toman B. Analysis of key comparison data: critical assessment of elements of current practice with suggested improvements// Metrologia. 2013. V. 50. P. 549-555.
7. Weise K., Wöger W. Removing model and data non-conformity in measurement evaluation// Meas. Sci. Technol. 2000. V. 11. P. 1649-1658.
8. Willink R. Statistical determination of a comparison reference value using hidden errors// Metrologia. 2002. V. 39. P. 343-354.
9. Cox M. G. The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset// Metrologia. 2007. V. 44. P. 187-200.
10. Elster C., Toman B. Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories’ biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging// Metrologia. 2010. V. 47. P. 113-119.
11. White D. R. On the analysis of measurement comparisons// Metrologia. 2004. V. 41. P. 122-131.
12. Sutton C. M. Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons// Metrologia. 2004. V. 41. P. 272-227.
13. Toman B, Possolo A. Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons// Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 2009. V. 14. P. 553-563.
14. Чуновкина А. Г., Бурмистрова Н. А., Звягин Н. Д. Об одном подходе к оцениванию результатов ключевых сличений эталонов при несогласованных данных // Измерительная техника. 2013. № 6. С. 3-6; Chunovkina A. G., Burmistrova N. A., Zvyagin N. D. An approach for evaluating the results of key comparisons of standards with inconsistent data // Measurement Techniques. 2013. V. 56. N 6. P. 577-583.
15. Chunovkina A. G., Zviagin N. D., Burmistrova N. A. Interlaboratory Comparisons. Practical Approach for Data Evaluation// ACTA IMEKO. 2013. V. 2. N. 2. P. 28-33.
16. Burmistrova N. A., Zviagin N. D. The algorithm for obtaining metrological compatibility of measurement results while analyzing key comparison data // Theses 5th COOMET Competition for Young Metrologists. Braunschweig, 2013, P. 1-4.
17. CCQM-K5. Key Comparison - Determination of pp’-DDE in Fish Oil. Final Report, March 2001 [Офиц. сайт]. http: www.bipm.org (дата обращения 30.11.2013 г.)
18. JCGM 200:2008. International vocabulary of metrology - Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM3) [Офиц. сайт]. http: www.bipm.org (дата обращения 30.11.2013 г.)
Review
For citations:
. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2014;(10):7-12. (In Russ.)
Views:
82
Email this article 