Preview

Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

State primary standard of power, intensity, and pressure of ultrasound in water GET 169-2025

https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2026-1-12-21

Abstract

The proliferation of ultrasound medical devices and the development of ultrasound diagnostic and therapeutic methods have necessitated metrological control of a wide range of ultrasound medical equipment acoustic output parameters, such as ultrasound pressure and intensity. To ensure the uniformity of high-frequency (0.5–20 MHz) hydroacoustic measurements, as well as to implement metrological traceability of intensity and pressure measurement results obtained using ultrasonic field parameter meters and high-frequency hydrophones, respectively, the State primary standard of the unit of ultrasound power in water, GET 169-2019, has been improved. As a result of these improvements, the State primary standard of the units of ultrasound power, intensity, and pressure in water, GET 169-2025, has been approved. This standard includes two new units: the URTU-1 unit for reproducing and transmitting the unit of ultrasound intensity in water and the URTU-2 unit for reproducing and transmitting the unit of ultrasound pressure in water. The expansion of the list of units reproducible using GET 169-2025 enables metrological traceability of the results of ultrasound power, intensity, and pressure measurements in water, and therefore of devices designed to measure and control the acoustic output parameters of medical ultrasound and other equipment. Amendments have been made to the state verification scheme for ultrasound power measuring instruments in the frequency range from 0.5 to 20 MHz, reflecting the new capabilities of GET 169-2025 and addressing the challenges of distributing working standards to metrology centers across the Russian Federation.

About the Authors

S. I. Kuznetsov
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Sergey I. Kuznetsov, Junior Researcher

141570, Moscow Region, Solnechnogorsk, Mendeleevo settlement, industrial zone of FSUE VNIIFTRI, building 11



G. S. Lukin
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Georgiy S. Lukin, Head of Laboratory

141570, Moscow Region, Solnechnogorsk, Mendeleevo settlement, industrial zone of FSUE VNIIFTRI, building 11



References

1. Rajeet Chandan, Sourabh Mehta, Rinti Banerjee. Ultrasound-responsive carriers for therapeutic applications. ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, 6(9), 4731–4747 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01979 ; https://elibrary.ru/pdqgqe

2. Dubinsky T. J., Cuevas C., Dighe M. K., Kolokythas O., Hwang J. H. High-intensity focused ultrasound: current potential and oncologic applications. American Journal of Roentgenology, 190(1), 191–199 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2671 ; https://elibrary.ru/lygych

3. Preston R. C. Metrology and traceability in medical ultrasound – Experiences and lessons for the future. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1, 1 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1/1/001

4. Esteban-Temprano Á., De Castro-Asensio I., Delgado-San Martín L. et al. Emerging innovations in health metrology for diagnostic imaging, Measurement: Sensors, 38, 101649 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101649

5. Petchpong P. Verifi cation of Medical Measuring Device on Therapeutic Ultrasound Using Metrological Traceability. 2019 58th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 817–822 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23919/SICE.2019.8859967

6. Souza R. M., Alvarenga A. V., Petrella L. I. et al. Metrological assessment of image quality in ultrasonic medical diagnostic equipment. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 36, 379–397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-020-00078-4

7. Enyakov A. M. Measuring capabilities of medical ultrasound diagnostic devices. Legal and Applied Metrology, (1), 47–55 (2006). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pbnntx

8. Enyakov A. M. Monitoring the technical characteristics of medical echo-pulse ultrasound diagnostic devices. Legal and Applied Metrology, (4), 13–17 (2006). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pbnxcp

9. Enyakov A. M. On regulatory support for the development and use of devices for ultrasound therapy. Legal and Applied Metrology, (6), 25–30 (2006). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pbnxur

10. Enyakov A. M. In-service control of efficiency and safety of ultrasonic medical equipment. World of Measurements, (12), 10–18 (2012). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pidqll

11. Enyakov A. M. Metrological problems of ultrasound application in physiotherapy. Al’manac of Modern Metrology, (4), 152–193 (2015). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vdtxhb

12. Isaev A. E., Kuznetsov S. I., Lomovatskiy Y. A. et al. VNIIFTRI reference base in the field of underwater acoustic measurements: metrological characteristics, functional capabilities, innovations, and prospects for improving standards. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika, 73(12), 46–54 (2024). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2024-12-46-54 ; https://elibrary.ru/dkwbov

13. Enyakov A. M. Will we calibrate high technology medical equipment? Al’manac of Modern Metrology, (9), 153–173 (2017). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ykjuct

14. Haar G. Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations. Interface Focus, 1(4), 686–697 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0029

15. Miller D. L., Smith N. B., Bailey M. R. et al. Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 31(4), 623–634 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.623 ; https://elibrary.ru/rhzpwd

16. Еnyakov А. М., Kuznetsov S. I., Lukin G. S. State primary measurement standard of ultrasound power unit in water GET 169-2019. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika, (3), 3–8 (2020). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-3-3-8 ; https://elibrary.ru/uskvzi

17. Еnyakov А. М., Kuznetsov S. I., Lukin G. S. Experimental estimation of the sources of measurement uncertainty of the total power of an ultrasound beam in water by the method of plane scanning of the beam cross section. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika, (11), 56–61 (2019). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2019-11-56-61 ; https://elibrary.ru/weziep

18. Enyakov А. М. National standard for a unit of ultrasonic power in water. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika, (3), 3–7 (2006). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/muzjtt

19. Kuznetsov S. I. Reference power meter for ultrasound beam in water EIMU-3. Al’manac of Modern Metrology, (3(31)), 31–44 (2022). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nhawan

20. Еnyakov А. М., Lukin G. S. Metrological problems of measuring the ultrasonic power of high-intensity focused emissions. Legal and Applied Metrology, (1(152)), 47–53 (2018). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/unzgvt

21. Еnyakov А. М., Kuznetsov S. I. Applications of Sound-Transparent Metallized Films for Hydrophone Calibration Using Free-Field Optical Interferometry. Al’manac of Modern Metrology, (3(27)), 85–103 (2021). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hnslfs

22. Lukin G. S. Preparation of water for ultrasonic measurements. The future is ours: abstracts of reports of the III International scientific and practical conference of young scientists and specialists and texts of works of participants of the pilot international competition “Best young metrologist of the CIS IGS 2024”, St. Petersburg, June 11–14, 2024, pp. 355–356 (2024). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gomhrs


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsov S.I., Lukin G.S. State primary standard of power, intensity, and pressure of ultrasound in water GET 169-2025. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2026;75(1):12-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2026-1-12-21

Views: 219

JATS XML

ISSN 0368-1025 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5237 (Online)