Ways to solve the problems of creating predictive measurement systems
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2026-1-101-110
Abstract
The main problems of creating predictive measurement systems are considered. The role of predictive analytics, digital models and digital twins of measuring systems in predicting the drift of metrological characteristics, estimating the remaining resource and reducing the risk of metrological failure is shown. The key aspects of the development of intelligent measuring systems are considered: requirements for metrological support and features of measuring instruments based on artifi cial intelligence, the infl uence of their multicomponence and opacity of algorithms on the procedures of verifi cation, calibration and metrological self-control. Based on current standards and scientifi c publications, the terminology used in this fi eld is evaluated, and a defi nition of a predictive measuring system is proposed, including functions for predicting both process parameters and the metrological dependability of measuring instruments. Recommendations are formulated to improve methods for assessing the risk of metrological failure and the need to detail the requirements for intelligent measuring systems through the development (revision) of standards is noted.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. Sh. SulaberidzeRussian Federation
Vladimir Sh. Sulaberidze, D. Sci. (Engineering), Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher of the Research Laboratory of Theoretical Metrology
190005, St. Petersburg, Moskovsky ave., 19
A. G. Chunovkina
Russian Federation
Anna G. Chunovkina, D. Sci. (Engineering), Head of the Metrology Department; Professor at the Department of Metrological Support for Innovative Technologies and Industrial Safety
190005, St. Petersburg, Moskovsky ave., 19; 190121, Russia, St. Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya st., 67, bldg. A
A. N. Pronin
Russian Federation
Anton N. Pronin, Director
190005, St. Petersburg, Moskovsky ave, 19
A. A. Nekliudova
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Nekliudova, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Chief Metrologist, Associate Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Metrology; Associate Professor at the Department of Metrological Support for Innovative Technologies and Industrial Safety
190005, St. Petersburg, Moskovsky ave, 19; 190121, St. Petersburg, Bolshaya
Morskaya st., 67, bldg. A
ResearcherID: O-3887–2018
K. A. Tomskyi
Russian Federation
Konstantin A. Tomskyi, D. Sci. (Engineering), Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Metrology
190005, St. Petersburg, Moskovsky ave., 19
References
1. Shepeleva O. S., Tkacheva K. A. Ethics and “numbers”: ethical issues of digital technologies. (In Russ.) https://ethics. cdto.ranepa.ru (accessed: 8 Jun 2025).
2. Artifi cial intelligence in Russia: development and application: report. Gokhberg L. M., Rudnik P. B., Abdrakhmanova G. I. (ed.), National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow (2025). (In Russ.) https://issek.hse.ru/ (accessed: 8 June 2025).
3. Siegel E. Calculate the future: Whoever clicks, buys, lies or dies. Al’pina Pablisher, Moscow (2014). (In Russ.)
4. Shabbir J., Anwer T. Artifi cial Intelligence and its role in near future. 1 Apr 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.01396
5. Qomariyah N. N. Artifi cial Intelligence Defi nition. https://international.binus.ac.id/computer-science/2020/11/09/artifi cialintelligence-definition/ (accessed: 20 May 2025).
6. De Kleijn M., Siebert M. Huggett S. Artifi cial Intelligence: how knowledge is created, transferred and used (2019). https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/6732 (accessed: 28 Jan 2026).
7. Artifi cial Intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning: same context, different concepts. (2018). https://master-iescangers.com/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-and-deep-learning-same-context-different-concepts/ (accessed: 20 May 2025).
8. Legg S., Hutter M. A collection of defi nitions of intelligence. 25 Jun 2007. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0706.3639
9. Nilsson N. J. The Quest for Artifi cial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge University Press, England (2010). 10. Russell S., Norvig P. Artifi cial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th US ed. Prentice Hall, USA (2020). 11. Martinez R. Artificial Intelligence: Distinguishing Between Types & Defi nitions (2019). https://www.academia.edu/102674235/Artifi cial_Intelligence_Distinguishing_Between_Types_and_Defi nitions (accessed: 20 May 2025).
10. Valtorta M. Artifi cial Intelligence. University of South Carolina, Columbia (2008).
11. Winston P. H. Artifi cial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA (1992).
12. Ballester O. An Artifi cial Intelligence defi nition and classifi cation framework for public sector applications. DG.O’21: Proc. 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, June 09–11, 2021, Omaha, NE, USA, рр. 67–75 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463709
13. Solopchenko G. N. Measurement information systems. Study guide for university students. Izdatel’stvo Politekhnicheskogo un-ta, St. Petersburg (2015). (In Russ.)
14. Udovichenko E. T., Bragin A. A., Semenyuk A. L. et al. Metrological support of measuring information systems (theory, methodology, organization). Izdatel’stvo standartov, Moscow (1991). (In Russ.)
15. Yashin V. N. Evaluation of metrological reliability of measuring instruments by method of generating functions. Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Technical Sciences Series. 28(2), 84–96 (2020). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14498/tech.2020.2.6 ; https://elibrary.ru/cvwgnc
16. Protasov A. A., Shirmanov A. V., Radomanov S. I. Priority tasks of the introduction of artifi cial intelligence technologies in the interests of automating the activities of military command and control bodies. Informatization and communication, (2), 91–94 (2021). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34219/2078-8320-2021-12-2-91-94 ; https://www.elibrary.ru/maeexo
17. Vedurmudi A. P., Miličević K., Kok G. et al. Automation in sensor network metrology: An overview of methods and their implementations. Measurement: Sensors, Supplement, 38, 101799 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101799 ; https://elibrary.ru/ivhsxa
18. Prokopchina S. V. A new direction in artifi cial intelligence: measuring artifi cial intelligence. XXVII International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM’2024), 22–24 May, 2024, Russia, St. Petersburg, 1, 3–6 (2024). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rthbvl
19. Borovkov A. I., Ryabov Yu. A., Kukushkin K. V., Maruseva V. M., Kulemin V. Yu. Digital twins and the digital transformation of defense industry enterprises. Vestnik Vost-Sibirskoj otkrytoj akademii, (32), 2 (2019). (I n Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zaxcot
20. Fridman A. E. Theory of metrological dependability of measuring instruments and other technical means having precision characteristics. Doctor’s dissertation Technical sciences, D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology, St. Petersburg (1994). (In Russ.)
21. Novitskiy P. V., Zograf I. A., Labunets V. S. The dynamics of measurement error. Energoatomizdat. Leningr. otd-nie, Leningrad (1990). (In Russ.)
22. Sulaberidze V. Sh., Neklyudova A. A. Metrological reliability of measurement instruments and assessment of the risk of metrological failure. Transactions of the TSTU, 29(4), 574–585 (2023). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17277/vestnik.2023.04.pp.574-585 ; https://elibrary.ru/gndjys
23. Sulaberidze V. Sh., Neklyudova A. A., Mikheev V. A. Metrological Dependability of measuring instruments. Educational and methodical manual. Renome, St. Petersburg (2023). (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Sulaberidze V.Sh., Chunovkina A.G., Pronin A.N., Nekliudova A.A., Tomskyi K.A. Ways to solve the problems of creating predictive measurement systems. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2026;75(1):101-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2026-1-101-110
JATS XML




















