Results of pilot comparisons in the field of measuring the nutritional value of milk powder COOMET 880/RU-a/23

A necessary condition for obtaining high-quality food products that satisfy human physiological needs for essential nutrients and energy is continuous monitoring of the macronutrient content. The correctness of measurements in the process of such monitoring is verified by analyzing, in parallel with working samples reference materials of the composition of food products and food raw materials. The certified values of these reference materials shall be traceable to measurement standards and/or measurement results of national metrology institutes. For mutual recognition of the calibration and measurement capabilities of national metrology institutes, they must obtain equivalent results in key comparisons. The possibility of organizing key comparisons is assessed during pilot comparisons. The article presents the results of pilot comparisons in the field of measuring the nutritional value of milk powder COOMET 880/RU-а/23 with the participation of national metrology institutes of the Russian Federation, Republic of Belarus, Kyrgyz Republic and China. Samples of skim and whole milk powder were selected as the objects of comparison. The measured characteristics are mass fraction of moisture, nitrogen, protein, fat, ash, carbohydrates (lactose). Each participant in the comparison used measurement procedures, measurement instruments and equipment that ensure the highest accuracy. When assessing the uncertainty of the values of the specified measured characteristics, the participants took into account the standard deviation of the results of parallel determinations, uncertainties from the quantities included in the measurement equations, and methodological factors. The comparisons demonstrated the consistency of most of the measurement results presented by the participants. Some deviating measurement results of operationally determined quantities (mass fraction of ash, mass fraction of moisture) are due to the empirical nature of the methods used, i.e. the dependence of the measurement results on the applied drying or ashing conditions. For rational values (mass fraction of nitrogen), the discrepancies are probably due to incomplete extraction of the component from the test sample, as well as the lack of established traceability of the sample used to standardize the titrant. The results of the comparisons will be used in preparing proposals for conducting key comparisons for the purpose of mutual recognition of national standards and calibration and measurement certificates in the field of measuring the nutritional value of milk powder.

1. Kruchinin A. G., Illarionova E. E., Bigaeva A. V., Turovskaya S. N. The role of dry milk technological properties in forming the quality of food systems. Bulletin of KSAU, (8(161)), 166–173 (2020). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2020-8-166-173

2. Garczewska-Murzyn A., Kiełczewska K., Smoczyński M. The influence of buttermilk powder on the stability of emulsion and colloidal phases of homogenized milk. European Food Research and Technology, 248, 2629–2636 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04075-y

3. Dantas F. B. H., Alvim I. D., Miguel A. M. R. D. , Alves R. M. V., Júnior L. M. Influence of different packaging materials on the stability of Omega-3-Enriched milk powder during storage. Journal of Packaging Technology and Research, 6, 225–233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-022-00143-6

4. Medvedevskikh M., Krasheninina M., Cárdenas I. A. G., Erazo L. V. M., Forigua D. A. A., Rego E. C. P. D., Wollinger W., Monteiro T. M., Carvalho L. J. D., Garcia.S. A. A., Chan K. W. Y., Fung W.-H., Haraldsson C., Gavrilkin V., Kulik S., Rodriguez L. G., Zharkynbekova A. Report of CCQM-K149 nitrogen mass fraction measurements in milk powder. Metrologia, 56(1А), 08011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/56/1A/08011

5. Brown R. J. C., Andres H. How should metrology bodies treat method-defined measurands? Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 25, 161–166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01424-w

6. Simonet B. M., Lendl B., Valcarcel M. Method-defined parameters: measurands sometimes forgotten. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 25(5), 520–527 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2005.09.007

7. Bievre P. D. Essential for metrology in chemistry, but not yet achieved: truly internationally understood concepts and associated terms. Metrologia, 45(3), 335–341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/3/011

8. Krasheninina M. P., Medvedevskikh M. Y., Medvedevskikh S. V., Sobina E. P., Neudachina L. K. An estimate of the metrological characteristics of a standard sample of the composition of dried whole milk using primary and secondary state standards. Measurement Techniques, 56(9), 1076–1082 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-013-0333-8

9. Gorshkov V. V., Koryakov V. I., Medvedevskikh M. Y., Medvedevskikh S. V. State primary standard of unit of mass fraction and unit of mass concentration of moisture in solid substances and solid fabricated materials. Measurement Techniques, 53(4), 386–390 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-010-9515-9

10. Medvedevskikh S. V., Baranovskaya V. B., Medvedevskikh M. Y., Krasheninina M. P., Sergeeva A. S. Reference measurement procedure for the determination of mass fraction of fat content in food. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 26(3), 165–175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-021-01472-w

11. Medvedevskikh M. Yu., Sergeeva A. S., Krasheninina M. P., Shokhina O. S. State primary reference procedure for the measurement of ash mass fraction in food, foodstuff and alimentary raw materials. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials, 85(6), 70–80 (2019) (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-6-70-80

12. Golynets O. S., Sergeeva A. S., Krasheninina M. P., Shokhina O. S. Development of measurement procedures for the characterization of reference materials for carbohydrate composition of dairy products. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials, 18(2), 35–56 (2022) (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2022-18-2-35-56

13. Moore J. C., DeVries J. W., Lipp M, Grifi ths J. C., Abernethy D. R. Total protein methods and their potential utility to reduce the risk of food protein adulteration. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 9(4), 330–351 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00114.x

14. Sobina A. V., Terentiev G. I., Shimolin A. Yu., Zyskin V. M. Role of the state primary standard on the basis of coulombometry SS 176 / in supporting the traceability of the analytical measurement results. Al’manac of modern metrology, (2(14)), 26–34 (2018). (In Russ.)

15. Jones D. B. Factors for converting percentages of nitrogen in foods and feeds into percentages of protein. US Department of Agriculture, circ. 183, Washington, DC (1941).

16. Medvedevskikh S. V., Medvedevskikh M. Y., Karpov Y. A. General approaches to the estimation of uncertainty in the results of reproducing units of water content in solids and materials. Measurement Techniques, 58(8), 926–933 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-015-0819-7