Preview

Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Measurement problems of conformity assessment in the quality infrastructure

https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2025-1-63-76

Abstract

A brief description of the problems that arise in the measurement problems of assessing compliance with established requirements in the quality infrastructure is given, including in connection with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E) “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories” for documenting and applying decision-making rules for determinative and control tests, taking into account possible risks. These problems are conventionally divided into two groups: problems of methods for solving measurement problems, on which discussions are still ongoing, and problems of conformity assessment procedures, for which the experience of control theory can be used. The first group includes the problems of uncertainty and precision of measurement, the inadequacy of measurement equations in the indirect measurement method, the loss of the property of freedom from distribution by the criteria of agreement in the statistical verification of complex hypotheses, the exclusion of outliers in measurement protocols and terminological contradictions. It is shown that the measurement tasks of assessing compliance with established requirements in the quality infrastructure can be formulated as typical problems of the theory of control. Therefore, the second group consists of problems that can be solved by methods for determining the completeness of control, setting tolerance limits for controlled parameters, and selecting the confidence level. Then it becomes possible to assess the risks of statistical assumptions, false positive and false negative decisions about compliance with established requirements based on mathematical models of control objects.

About the Author

S. F. Levin
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Russian Federation

Sergey F. Levin



References

1. Isaev L. K. Quality infrastructure and the role of metrology. Competency, (3), 26–30 (2023). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1993-8780-2023-3-26-30

2. Sanetra C., Marban R. M. The answer to the global quality challenge: A national quality infrastructure. PTB, OAS and SIM (2007).

3. Zaharenko E. N., Komarova L. N., Nechaeva I. V. A new dictionary of foreign words. Azbukovnik, Moscow (2003). (In Russ.)

4. A dictionary of foreign words. Eds. Lekhina I. V., Lokshinoj S. M., Petrova F. N. (chief editor), Shaumyana L. S. Ed. 6. Sovetskaya enciklopediya, Moscow (1964). (In Russ.)

5. Levin S. F. New requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Legislative and applied metrology, (1), 34–41 (2020). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mfgyay

6. Levin S. F. Inadequacy of mathematical models of measurement objects and calculations of risk based on the use of Gost ISO/IEC 17025-2019. Measurement Techniques, 63(7), 524–533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01819-8

7. Levin S. F. Level of verification of measuring instruments and a posteriori reliability of control. Measurement Techniques, 61(9), 863–871 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-018-1516-0

8. Levin S. F. Control of technical facilities according to emergency and defining parameters. Znanie, Kiev (1992). (In Russ.)

9. Levin S. F. Measurement tasks in indirect functional monitoring of aircraft state. Measurement Techniques, 39(5), 470–476 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02375752

10. Cox M., Harris P. An outline of Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement on numerical methods for the propagation of distributions. Measurement Techniques, 48(4), 336–345 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-005-0146-5

11. Efremova N. Y., Chunovkina A. G. Development of the concept of uncertainty in measurement and revision of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Part 2. Comparative analysis of basic provisions of the Guide and their planned changes. Measurement Techniques, 60(5), 418–424 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-017-1212-5

12. Levin S. F. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement: problems, unrealized capabilities, and revisions. Part 2. Probabilistic-Statistical Problems. Measurement Techniques, 61(4), 327–334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-018-1429-y

13. Levin S. F. Unsolved problems of “precision”. Glavnyj metrolog, (3), 5–7 (2003). (In Russ.)

14. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). 2nd. ed. BIMP, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, Geneva (1995).

15. Rukovodstvo po vyrazheniyu neopredelyonnosti izmereniya. Translated from English VNIIM, ed. prof. V. A. Slaev. VNIIM, St. Petersburg (1999). (In Russ.)

16. Lemeshko B. Yu., Postovalov S. N. Application of nonparametric agreement criteria in testing complex hypotheses. Avtometriya, (2), 88–102 (2001). (In Russ.) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315334310_Primenenie_neparametriceskih_kriteriev_soglasia_pri_proverke_sloznyh_gipotez

17. Bol’shev L. H., Smirnov H. V. Tables of mathematical statistics. Nauka, Moscow (1983). (In Russ.)

18. Zemel’man M. A. Metrological bases of technical measurements. Izdatelstvo standartov, Moscow (1991). (In Russ.)

19. Tishchenko V. A., Tokatly V. I., Luk’yanov V. I. Translation and borrowing of terminology from international metrological documents. Measurement Techniques 46(10), 931–937 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:METE.0000010779.67593.45

20. Ehrlich C., Dybkaer R., Wöger W. Evolution of philosophy and description of measurement (preliminary rationale forVIM3). Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 12, 201–218 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-007-0259-4

21. Levin S. F. Semantic analysis of compound terms in metrology. Part 2: Risk in measurement and calculations. Measurement Techniques, 67(2), 97–108 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-024-02325-x

22. Korn G., Korn T. Handbook of Mathematics for researchers and engineers. Nauka, Moscow (1968). (In Russ.)

23. Novickij P. V., Zograf I. A. Estimation of measurement errors. Energoatomizdat, Leningrad (1985). (In Russ.)

24. Levin S. F. A Guide to expressing measurement uncertainty: is revision a paradigm shift or a new sanction? Legislative and applied metrology, (5), 31–44 (2016). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wwoxwb

25. International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms. VIM, 3rd ed. (2007).

26. Mezhdunarodnyj slovar’ po metrologii: osnovnye i obshchie ponyatiya i sootvetstvuyushchie terminy. Translated from English and French VNIIM, BelGIM. Ed. 2. NPO “Professional”, St. Petersburg (2010).

27. Erlih Ch., Dibker R., Vyoger V. The evolution of philosophy and the interpretation of the concept of “measurement”. Glavnyj metrolog, (1), 11–30 (2016). (In Russ.)

28. Fridman A. É. What have metrologists been doing these last 200 years? Measurement Techniques, 51(3), 339–340 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-008-9021-5

29. Bich W., Cox M. G., Harris P. M. Evolution of the “Guide to the Expression of the Uncertainty in Measurement”. Metrologia, 43(4), S161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S01

30. Bich W., Cox M. G., Dybkaer R. et al. Revision of the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”. Metrologia, 49(6), 702–705 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/6/702

31. Sheffe G. Analysis of variance. Fizmatlit, Moscow (1963). (In Russ.)

32. Physical encyclopedia in 5 volumes. Prokhorov A. M. (chief editor). Vol. 3. The Magnetoplasmic – Poynting theorem. Bol’shaya Rossijskaya enciklopediya, Moscow (1992). (In Russ.)

33. Kas M., Kiefer J., Wolfowitz J. On tests of normality and other tests of goodness of fit based on distance methods. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26(2), 189–211. (1955). https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728538

34. Basic terms in the field of metrology: A reference dictionary, ed. Yu. V. Tarbeev, Izdatelstvo standartov, Moscow (1989). (In Russ.)

35. Tishchenko V. A., Tokatly V. I., Luk’yanov V. I. Comments on the metrological documents regulating the processing of measurement results. Legislative and applied metrology, (4), 7–12 (2006). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pbnxcf

36. Levin S. F. Fundamentals of control theory. MO SSSR, Moscow (1983). (In Russ.)

37. Levin S. F. About the metrological mentality: calibration and definitive uncertainty. Legislative and applied metrology, (2), 46–55 (2020). (In Russ.)

38. Levin S. F. Problems concerning the calibration of measuring instruments under specified conditions. Measurement Techniques, 64(4), 273–281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01929-x

39. Levin S. F. Metrology. Mathematical statistics. Legends and Myths of the 20th century: The Legend of Uncertainty. Partnery i konkurenty, (1), 13–25 (2001). (In Russ.)

40. Levin S. F. Indeterminateness of the results of calibrating measuring instruments in the narrow and the broad sense. Measurement Techniques, 50(9), 921–928 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-007-0173-5

41. Chunovkina A. G. Introducing measurement uncertainty into methods of calibrating and checking measuring instruments. Measurement Techniques, 51(3), 341–343 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-008-9022-4


Review

For citations:


Levin S.F. Measurement problems of conformity assessment in the quality infrastructure. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2025;74(1):63-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2025-1-63-76

Views: 126


ISSN 0368-1025 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5237 (Online)