

Evaluation of computed tomography anode voltage in clinical application: the influence of profiled filters
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2024-7-70-78
Abstract
Monitoring of operational parameters of X-ray diagnostic equipment, including computer tomographs, is mandatory during acceptance and periodic tests in medical organizations. The importance of control of anode voltage of X-ray radiator is described (as one of the main technical parameters in diagnostic tests of patients, which can influence the quality of visualization and safe operation of the equipment). Anode voltage is evaluated by non-invasive methods using universal dosimeters in the user mode of equipment operation. The influence of profiled filters of Somatom Definition AS, SOMATOM go.All (Siemens, Germany) scanners on the accuracy of anode voltage measurement was investigated. The tests were conducted in clinic conditions without partial removal of the gantry (a structural element of the tomograph, inside which the system “X-ray emitter – detector” is located) and connection to the high-voltage circuit of the device. The distance between the sensitive elements of the measuring device and the displacement of the center of the sensing area relative to the position of the central axis of the X-ray beam of computed tomography scanner were taken into account. Normalized curves of kerma values, anode voltage values and their approximating analytical functions were obtained using a Piranha R&F/M 657 universal dosimeter (RTI Electronics AB, Sweden) at its displacement relative to the laser centralizer of computed tomography scanner. Based on the scheme for noninvasive estimation of anode voltage value, a formula of the relative deviation of the measured value of the anode voltage associated with the presence of a profiled filter at the output of the X-ray emitter of the tomograph and the displacement of the center point of the sensitive area of the measuring device relative to the central axis of the X-ray beam of the tomograph is obtained. The validity of the data based on the formula is confirmed experimentally. The results of the study will be helpful to technical specialists who maintain or control the X-ray computed tomography operating parameters.
Keywords
About the Authors
Yu. A. VasilevRussian Federation
Yuriy A. Vasilev
Moscow
M. R. Akhmedzyanova
Russian Federation
Maria R. Akhmedzyanova
Moscow
M. I. Zelikman
Russian Federation
Mikhail I. Zelikman
Moscow
S. A. Kruchinin
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Kruchinin
Moscow
References
1. Morozov S. P., Lindenbraten L. D., Gabay P. G. et al. Basic principles of medical organization management, GEOTARMedia Publishing Group, Moscow (2020). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/9704-5247-9-MEN-2020-1-424
2. Ryzhkin S. A., Druzhinina Y. V., Lantukh Z. A. et al. Problems of personnel irradiation in modern medical technologies. Digital Diagnostics, 4(2), 142–155 (2023). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17816/DD375327
3. Akhmedzyanova M. R., Zelikman M. I., Kruchinin S. A. et al. Operational monitoring of the operability of digital X-ray diagnostic devices before the start of patient admission. Vestnik natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo yadernogo universiteta “MIFI”, 12(6), 357–367 (2023). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26583/vestnik.2023.283
4. Kruchinin S. A., Vasilev Y. A., Petraikin A. V. Сomputer program RU2021619933. Computer Programs. Databases. Topographies of integrated circuits, (7) (2023). (In Russ.)
5. Karyagin M. A. Current state and trends in the development of methods and devices for noninvasive measurement of X-Ray tube voltage. Biomedical Engineering, 47(5), 250–252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-014-9383-8
6. Blinov N. N., Kolesnikova N. V. Main performance specifcations of X-Ray computer tomographs as a guide to selecting the best tomograph model for a special care institution. Biomedical Engineering, 47(5), 268–272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-014-9388-3
7. Muslimov D. A., Lelyukhin A. S. Methods and devices for anode voltage measurement in X-ray apparatuses. Biomedical Engineering, 45(5), 189–193 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-011-9239-4
8. Blinov N. N. Normirovanie i kontrol’ kachestva pri ehkspluatatsii apparatov i oborudovaniya dlya luchevoi diagnostiki. Radiology and Practice, (4), 62–71 (2009). (In Russ.)
9. Zelikman M. I., Kruchinin S. A., Morozov S. P. Metodika kontrolya osnovnykh ehlektricheskikh i radiatsionnykh kharakteristik rentgenovskikh komp’yuternykh tomografov v rezhime klinicheskogo ispol’zovaniya oborudovaniya: metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Luchshie praktiki luchevoi i instrumental’noi diagnostiki, GBUZ “NPKTS DIT DZM”, Moscow (2020), iss. 95. (In Russ.)
10. Kruchinin S. A. The method of ct electrical and radiation characteristics evaluation in clinical using conditions. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology, 9(4), 123–128 (2019). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-4-123-128
11. William K. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications, John Wiley&Sons, Inc. (2011).
12. Rentgenovskie diagnosticheskie apparaty. In 2 vol., vol. 2, eds. N. N. Blinov, B. I. Leonov. VNIIMT, NPO “EhkraN”, Moscow (2001). (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Vasilev Yu.A., Akhmedzyanova M.R., Zelikman M.I., Kruchinin S.A. Evaluation of computed tomography anode voltage in clinical application: the influence of profiled filters. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2024;(7):70-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2024-7-70-78