

Calibration laboratories: risk management and the problem of assessing opportunities
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-12-13-16
Abstract
The results of the assessment of the resources required to manage the capabilities of the calibration laboratory are presented. The research was conducted at the D. I. Mendeleev All-Russian Institute for Metrology. The interrelation of risk assessment methods in the activities of the calibration laboratory with the problem of capacity management is noted. Risk identification methods are part of building capacity to achieve the goals and objectives of the laboratory. Capacity management involves the application of new approaches to the allocation of laboratory resources. Approaches based on the Pareto distribution and the use of logistic curves are considered. The prospects of using hyperbolic distributions in the management of resources necessary for the implementation of innovations are noted. It is advisable to perform risk and innovation management taking into account the characteristic indicators of hyperbolic distributions. The consideration of characteristic indicators is aimed at optimizing the combination of frequently performed and unique works. It is shown that the new approach allows for the necessary selection of solutions to manage the capabilities and ensure the sustainable development of calibration laboratories. The method is applicable when performing work on the improvement of secondary standards and working standards of higher grades.
About the Authors
B. Ya. LitvinovRussian Federation
Boris Ya. Litvinov
St. Petersburg
M. V. Okrepilov
Russian Federation
Michael V. Okrepilov
St. Petersburg
R. V. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Ruslan V. Pavlov
St. Petersburg
O. I. Paliy
Russian Federation
Olga I. Paliy
St. Petersburg
References
1. Boldyrev I., Selivanova T., Sheveleva V., Risk and opportunity management in the testing laboratory, Production Quality Control, 2018, no. 12. pp. 4–12. (In Russ.)
2. Shkaruba N. Zh., Anchutkina M. V., Risk assessment system for verifi cation and calibration of measuring instruments in accredited laboratories, Science Without Borders, 2019, no. № 6(34), pp. 78–82. (In Russ.)
3. Wilkinson L., Revising the Pareto chart, The American Statistician, 2006, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 332–334. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152243
4. Kenneth H. Blanchard, Terry Waghorn, Jim Ballard, Mission Possible: Becoming a World-class Organization While There’s Still Time, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1997, 227 р.
5. Sednev V. A., Kudrin B. I., On the Sustainable Development of Economy And Society, Problems of Technosphere Risk Management, 2018, no. 1(45), pp. 125–132. (In Russ.)
6. Litvinov B. Ya., Okrepilov M. V., Pavlov R. V., Menedzhment izmeritel’nogo oborudovaniya, Competency (Russia), 2017, no. 4(145), pp. 21–25. (In Russ.)
7. Kudrin B. I., Tri doklada stroennoi konferentsii, Moscow, Publ. Ehlektrika, 2002, 136 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Litvinov B.Ya., Okrepilov M.V., Pavlov R.V., Paliy O.I. Calibration laboratories: risk management and the problem of assessing opportunities. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(12):13-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-12-13-16