

Assessment of Equivalence of the Spectral Radiance Scales following the results of the comparison between the National Metrology Institutes of Korea, China, and Russia
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-12-51-57
Abstract
The paper presents the assessment of equivalence of the spectral radiance scales in the wavelength range from 250 nm to 2500 nm, reproduced at the national metrology institutes of Korea (KRISS), China (NIM) and Russia (VNIIOFI), carried out in the framework of international comparison. The common set of three tungsten strip lamps was used as an artefact. Based on a series of blind measurements of the lamps spectral radiance performed at each laboratory, the reference value of the comparison was determined at each wavelength as a weighted mean of the measured data of three laboratories. The degree of equivalence of each laboratory was then calculated as the deviation of the measurement data of that participant from the reference value. A data analysis method was proposed for calculating the degree of equivalences and their uncertainties. The method is based on processing spectral radiance ratios, rather than differences, which allows eliminating the influence of a result of one particular participant to results of other laboratories. The comparison results confirm the equivalence of spectral radiance scales of all the laboratories within their (k=2) expanded uncertainties except a few wavelength points.
About the Authors
D. ShinKorea, Republic of
Dong-Joo Shin
Daejeon
B. B. Khlevnoy
Russian Federation
Boris B. Khlevnoy
Moscow
C. Da
China
Caihong Da
Beijing
S. Park
Korea, Republic of
Seongchong Park
Daejeon
D. Lee
Korea, Republic of
Dong-Hoon Lee
Daejeon
M. V. Solodilov
Russian Federation
Maxim V. Solodilov
Moscow
S. S. Kolesnikova
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Kolesnikova
Moscow
Z. Wu
China
Zhifeng Wu
Beijing
Ya. Wang
China
Yanfei Wang
Beijing
References
1. The International System of Units (SI). https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si-brochure/SI-Brochure-9-EN.pdf
2. Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certifi cates issued by national metrology institutes Paris, 14 October 1999. https://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/CIPM-MRA-2003.pdf
3. Shin D. J., Park S., Lee D. H., Dai C., Wu Z., Wang Y., Khlevnoy B., Solodilov M., Kolesnikova S., Metrologia, 2020, vol. 57, Technical Supplement. 02001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/02001
4. Hollandt J., Seidel J., Klein R., Ulm G., Migdall A. and Ware M., Primary Sources for Use in Radiometry in: Optical Radiometry. Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences, vol. 41, eds. A. C. Parr, R. U. Datla and J. L. Gardner, Elsevier/ Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2005.
5. Khlevnoy B., Metrologia, 2008, vol. 45, Technical Supplement. 02001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/02001
6. Khlevnoy B., Sapritsky V., Rougie B., Gibson C., Yoon H., Gaertner A., Taubert D. and Hartmann J., Metrologia, 2009, vol. 46, pp. S174–S180. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/46/4/S08
7. Khlevnoi B. B., Sapritskii V. I., Kolesnikova S. S., Measurement Techniques, 2010, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 748–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-010-9572-0
8. Guidelines for CCPR Key Comparisons Report Preparation. CCPR-G2. CCPR Key Comparison Working Group. Rev. 4. January 2019. https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CC/CCPR/CCPR-G2.pdf
9. Guidelines for RMO PR Key Comparisons. CCPR-G6.Version 1.0. October 2014. https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CC/CCPR/CCPR-G6.pdf
Review
For citations:
Shin D., Khlevnoy B.B., Da C., Park S., Lee D., Solodilov M.V., Kolesnikova S.S., Wu Z., Wang Ya. Assessment of Equivalence of the Spectral Radiance Scales following the results of the comparison between the National Metrology Institutes of Korea, China, and Russia. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2020;(12):51-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-12-51-57