Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Assessing the state of a complex ergatic system on the example of a system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-9-10-15
Abstract
Assessment of the state of the system of ensuring the uniformity of measurements is an urgent task, the solution of which is necessary for monitoring and forecasting its state. The paper proposes an approach to the development of a methodology for monitoring the state of the system to ensure the uniformity of measurements and forecasting its state, which takes into account the mutual influence of subsystems on each other. The approach is based on the hierarchy analysis method. The decomposition of the system of ensuring the uniformity of measurements for further processing of the sequence of judgments of the person (group of persons) making the decision is considered. The judgments are based on paired comparisons of the decomposition elements. The method of processing the judgments of a group of experts in order to obtain a generalized judgment on paired comparisons is described. The obtained results can be used as part of monitoring the state of the system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements and forecasting the measurement needs of the economy and society.
About the Authors
I. V. Krasavin
Russian Research Institute for Metrological Service
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Krasavin
Moscow
A. V. Yashin
Russian Research Institute for Metrological Service
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Yashin
Moscow
References
1. Sukharev M. G., Forecasting methods, Textbook, Moscow, Russian State University of Oil and Gas Publ., 2009, 208 p. (In Russ.)
2. Trofi mova L. A., Trofi mov V. V., Methods of making managerial decisions, Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2014, 336 р. (In Russ.)
3. Terelyansky P. V., Nonparametric examination of objects of complex structure, Moscow, Dashkov and Co. Publ., 2009, 221 p. (In Russ.)
4. Thomas L. Saaty, Kevin P. Kearns, Analytical Planning. The Organization of Systems, Pergamon Press, 1985, 226 p.
5. Krasavin I. V., Yashin A. V., Tulekbaeva A. K., IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Workshop on Materials and Engineering in Aeronautics (MEA 2020), 16–17 October 2020, Moscow, Russia, 2020, vol. 1027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1027/1/012014
6. Bryant Stephen, Joseph Kearns, Public Administration Review, 1982, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 144–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/975536
7. Saaty T. L., Peniwati K., Group Decision Making, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2008.
8. Saati T. L., Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process: the organization and prioritization of complexity, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2001. 370 p.
9. Saaty T. L., Thomas L., Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors – the analytic hierarchy/network process, Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences RACSAM, Series A, Mathematics, 2008, vol. 102, no. 2, рр. 251–318.
10. Krasavin I. V., Methodology for developing the concept of building a metrological support system for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Materials of the 40th scientifi c and technical conference of young scientists-military metrologists “Actual issues of military metrology”, Moscow region, FSBI “State Scientifi c and Research Center” of the Ministry of Defense of Russia, 2015.
Review
For citations:
Krasavin I.V., Yashin A.V. Assessing the state of a complex ergatic system on the example of a system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(9):10-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-9-10-15
Views:
96
Email this article 