

The question of metrological traceability of COOMET reference materials. Pt. 1. International practice on traceability establishment of reference materials’ certifed values
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-8-25-29
Abstract
The multiplication of national units transfer instruments with established values of metrological traceability in international organisations is one of the most actual development directions for a large number of countries, inasmuch as this direction contributes to the solution of a global problem of measurement results comparability which were received for various objects in different times in different parts of the world as well as indicates the high quality of measuring capabilities of an organisation or a country. The paper contains issues of establishment of metrological traceability of results of physicochemical measurements. The international practice on traceability establishment of reference materials’ certified values is described in the work. The authors also provided a brief overview of internationally accepted fundamental concepts of reference materials metrological traceability demonstration.
About the Authors
S. V. MedvedevskikhRussian Federation
Sergey V. Medvedevskikh
St. Petersburg
E. P. Sobina
Russian Federation
Egor P. Sobina
Ekaterinburg
O. N. Kremleva
Russian Federation
Olga N. Kremleva
Ekaterinburg
M. Y. Medvedevskikh
Russian Federation
Мaria Yu. Medvedevskikh
Ekaterinburg
A. V. Sobina
Russian Federation
Alena V. Sobina
Ekaterinburg
N. S. Taraeva
Russian Federation
Nataliya S. Taraeva
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Sargent M., Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2020, vol. 25, pp. 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01450-8
2. Do Ceu Ferreira M., Matos A., Leal R. P., Accreditation and quality assurance, 2015, vol. 20, pp. 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1149-9
3. Brown R. J. C., Andres H., Accreditation and quality assurance, 2020, vol. 25, pp. 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01424-w
4. Velychko O., Gordiyenko T., Standards, methods and solutions of metrology, Luigi Cocco, IntechOpen, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84853
5. Kyriacos T., Sappho M., Metrological requirements for accredited laboratories, 17th International congress of metrology, Paris, France, September 21–24 2015, Paris, EDP Sciences, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201502016
6. Bulska E., Metrology in chemistry. Lecture notes in chemistry, 2018, vol. 101, pp. 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99206-8_4
7. Miller W. G., Greenberg N., Budd J., Delatour V., IFCC Working Group on Commutability in Metrological Traceability, Clinica chimica acta, 2021, vol. 514, pp. 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.12.021
8. Paneva V. I., The role of interlaboratory comparison tests in the quality assurance of analytical measurements, used in conformity assessment, Reference Materials, 2009, no. 3, pp. 7–14. (In Russ.)
9. Kutyaykin V. G., Gorbachev P. A., Geyger Е. Yu., Savrovskiy K. K. Competency (Russia), 2020, no. 7, pp. 30–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/1024411/1993-8780-2020-10706
10.
Review
For citations:
Medvedevskikh S.V., Sobina E.P., Kremleva O.N., Medvedevskikh M.Y., Sobina A.V., Taraeva N.S. The question of metrological traceability of COOMET reference materials. Pt. 1. International practice on traceability establishment of reference materials’ certifed values. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(8):25-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-8-25-29