|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Regional comparisons of national primary standards machines on the Vickers and Brinell scales
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-8-21-24
Abstract
The determination and confi rmation of the calibration measurements capabilities of national metrological institutes is necessary for the verification of the estimated metrological characteristics of the primary standard machines of these institutes. The passage of national primary standards through the comparison procedure encourages a deep and detailed study of the factors that affect the uncertainty of measurements. Adding the calibration capabilities of metrological institutes to the database of the International Committee of Weights and Measures (hereinafter referred to as the CIPM) allows for calibration of measuring instruments, which is recognized by the entire world community. The article presents the results of comparisons of national primary hardness standards on the Vickers scale and on the Brinell scale between the metrological institutes of the countries that are members of the Organization of Euro-Asian Cooperation of state Metrological Institutions (СOOMET). The comparisons were carried out within the framework of the technical committee on Mass and Related quantities TC 1.6, subject code – 341/RU/05. The article describes the procedure for conducting regional key and additional comparisons of national primary hardness standards on the Brinell and Vickers scales. Based on the results of the comparisons, recommendations are given to the laboratories that participated in the comparisons about the extended measurement uncertainties that they can enter into the database of the International Committee of Weights and Measures.
About the Author
A. E. Aslanyan
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey E. Aslanyan
Mendeleevo, Moscow region
References
1. Doynikov A. S., Current state of the conceptual and terminological system of metrological science, Al’manac of Modern Metrology, 2016, no. 3 (8), pp. 9–25. (In Russ.)
2. Aslanyan E. G., Measurement Techniques, 2005, vol. 48, № 1, pp. 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-005-0100-6
3. Doynikov A. S., Lekcii po metrologii [Lectures on metrology], Mendeleevo, FSUE “VNIIFTRI” Publ., 2018, 292 p. (In Russ.)
4. Germak A., Herrmann K., Low S., Metrologia, 2010, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S07
5. Germak A., Origlia C., Analysis and estimation of possible large systematic error in Brinell hardness measurements, Proceedings of Hardmeko 2007, Tsukuba, Japan, 19–21 November 2007, pp. 76–80.
6. Hattori K., Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1065, no. 6, 062013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1065/6/062013
7. Aslanyan A., Aslanyan E., Obozniy E., Galat E., Dovzhenko Y., Zhamanbalin M., Metrologia, 2020, vol. 57, no. 1A, 07003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/07003
8. Aslanyan E., Menelao F., Herrmann K., Aslanyan A., Pivovarov V., Galat E., Dovzhenko Y., Zhamanbalin M., Metrologia, 2013, vol. 50, no. 1A, 07015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/1A/07015
9. Herrmann K., Metrologia, 2006, vol. 43, no. 1A, 07010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/43/1A/07010
10. Guideline on COOMET supplementary comparison evaluation COOMET R/GM/19:2016, available at: http://www.coomet.org/DB/isapi/cmt_docs/2016/5/21XQGO.pdf(accessed:10.06.2021).
11.
Review
For citations:
Aslanyan A.E. Regional comparisons of national primary standards machines on the Vickers and Brinell scales. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(8):21-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-8-21-24
Views:
146
Email this article 