Preview

Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development of international key comparisons in the field of chemico-analytical measurements

https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-7-65-72

Abstract

The most challenging goals in the field of chemico- and bioanalytical measurements are described. Solutions of these problems are presented, which are being solved in particular by participating in new international comparisons organized by the Cosultative Committee on the Amount of Substance of the International Committee on Weights and Measures (CCQM CIPM). The purposes and tasks of developing key comparisons in the following areas are described: isotopic measurements; determination of the purity of substances; organic analysis; bioanalytical measurements; measurements of aerosol particle parameters; measurements in the field of gas analysis and electrochemistry. It is shown that participation in international key comparisons makes it possible to obtain valid and reliable results of measurements of the composition and properties of gas and liquid media, as well as solid substances and materials.

About the Authors

L. A. Konopelko
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Leonid А. Konopelko

St. Petersburg



Y. A. Kustikov
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Yuri А. Kustikov

St. Petersburg



M. V. Okrepilov
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Mikhail V. Okrepilov

St. Petersburg



A. V. Kolobova
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Anna V. Kolobova

St. Petersburg



P. V. Migal
Ural Research Institute for Metrology – branch of FGUP “D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology”
Russian Federation

Pavel V. Migal

Yekaterinburg



A. I. Krylov
Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Anatoly I. Krylov

St. Petersburg



M. S. Vonskiy
Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Maksim S. Vonskiy

St. Petersburg



I. K. Chubchenko
Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Ian K. Chubchenko

St. Petersburg



O. V. Efremova
Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Olga V. Efremova

St. Petersburg



E. V. Kulyabina
0 Russian Research Institute for Metrological Service
Russian Federation

Elena V. Kulyabina

Moscow



V. I. Dobrovolskiy
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering Measurements
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Dobrovolskiy

Mendeleevo, Moscow region



A. Y. Mikheeva
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation

Alyena Yu. Mikheeva

St. Petersburg



References

1. General Conference for Weights and Measures (CGPM), Resolution 1 of 26 meeting of CGPM (13–16 November 2018), available at: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/26-2018/resolution-1 (accessed: 23.06.21).

2. Marquardt R., Meija J., Mester Z., et al. Defi nition of the mole (IUPAC Recommendation 2017), Pure Appl. Chem., 2018, vol. 90, nо. 1, рр. 175–180.

3. Richard J. C Brown, Paul J. Brewer, Metrologia, 2020, vol. 57 (6), p. 065002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab9db7

4. John R. de Laeter, John Karl Böhlke, P. De Bièvre, H. Hidaka, H. S. Peiser, K. J. R. Rosman, P. D. P. Taylor, Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report), De Gruyter, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683

5. International Committee for Weights and Measures, Proceedings of Session I of the 104th meeting, 9–10 March 2015, available at: https://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/CIPM/CIPM2015-I-EN.pdf (accessed: 13.11.18).

6. Konopelko L. A., Chubchenko Y. K., International Conference Laser Optics (ICLO), 2018, pp. 288–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/LO.2018.8435389

7. Viallon J. et al., Metrologia, vol. 57 (5), p. 055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab948c

8. Flores E. et al., Comparison of isotope ratio measurement capabilities for CO2: sample preparation and characterization by isotope ratio infrared spectroscopy, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 2020, p. 8518.

9. Konopelko L. A., Migal P. V., Sobina E. P., Razrabotka etalonov sravneniya v vide metallov vysokoj chistoty, Etalony. Standartnye obrazcy, 2019, vol. 15 (2), pp. 15–24. (In Russ.)

10. Jochen Vogl, Heinrich Kipphardt, Hans-Joachim Heinrich, Egor Sobina, Tatiana Tabatchikova, CCQM-P107.1 Purity of Zinc with respect to six defi ned metallic analytes, BAM Federal institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Draft Report, 2014.

11. Jochen Vogl at. al., CCQM-P149 Purity determination of zinc to be used as primary standard for zinc determination, BAM Federal institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Draft B, 2016.

12. Vogl J., CCQM-IAWG17-28 Roadmap for the purity determination of pure metallic elements. Basic principles and helpful advice, 2017, available at: https://www.bipm.org/wg/CCQM/IAWG/Allowed/April_2017/CCQM-IAWG17-28.pdf (accessed: 03.02.2021).

13. Mikheeva A. Y., Krylov A. I., Proslezhivaemost’ v organicheskom analize. Chast 1: Edinstvo izmereniy i sopostavimost’ nacionalnih I mezhdunarodnih etalonov, Etalony. Standartnye obrazcy, 2019, vol. 16 (3), pp. 5–22. (In Russ.)

14. Faruqui N., Kummrow A., Fu B., Divieto C., Rojas F., Kisulu F., Cavalcante J. J. V., Wang J., Campbell J., Martins J. L., Choi J.-H., Sassi M. P., Zucco M., Vonsky M., Vessillier S., Zou S., Fujii S.-I., Ryadnov M. G., Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2020, vol. 7, р. 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00456

15. Kolobova А. V., Konopelko L. А., Popov О. G., Etalony. Standartnye obrazcy, 2019, vol. 16 (3), pp. 23–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20915/2687-0886-2020-16-3-23-35


Review

For citations:


Konopelko L.A., Kustikov Y.A., Okrepilov M.V., Kolobova A.V., Migal P.V., Krylov A.I., Vonskiy M.S., Chubchenko I.K., Efremova O.V., Kulyabina E.V., Dobrovolskiy V.I., Mikheeva A.Y. Development of international key comparisons in the field of chemico-analytical measurements. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(7):65-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-7-65-72

Views: 108


ISSN 0368-1025 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5237 (Online)