

Development of international key comparisons in the field of chemico-analytical measurements
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-7-65-72
Abstract
The most challenging goals in the field of chemico- and bioanalytical measurements are described. Solutions of these problems are presented, which are being solved in particular by participating in new international comparisons organized by the Cosultative Committee on the Amount of Substance of the International Committee on Weights and Measures (CCQM CIPM). The purposes and tasks of developing key comparisons in the following areas are described: isotopic measurements; determination of the purity of substances; organic analysis; bioanalytical measurements; measurements of aerosol particle parameters; measurements in the field of gas analysis and electrochemistry. It is shown that participation in international key comparisons makes it possible to obtain valid and reliable results of measurements of the composition and properties of gas and liquid media, as well as solid substances and materials.
About the Authors
L. A. KonopelkoRussian Federation
Leonid А. Konopelko
St. Petersburg
Y. A. Kustikov
Russian Federation
Yuri А. Kustikov
St. Petersburg
M. V. Okrepilov
Russian Federation
Mikhail V. Okrepilov
St. Petersburg
A. V. Kolobova
Russian Federation
Anna V. Kolobova
St. Petersburg
P. V. Migal
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Migal
Yekaterinburg
A. I. Krylov
Russian Federation
Anatoly I. Krylov
St. Petersburg
M. S. Vonskiy
Russian Federation
Maksim S. Vonskiy
St. Petersburg
I. K. Chubchenko
Russian Federation
Ian K. Chubchenko
St. Petersburg
O. V. Efremova
Russian Federation
Olga V. Efremova
St. Petersburg
E. V. Kulyabina
Russian Federation
Elena V. Kulyabina
Moscow
V. I. Dobrovolskiy
Russian Federation
Vladimir I. Dobrovolskiy
Mendeleevo, Moscow region
A. Y. Mikheeva
Russian Federation
Alyena Yu. Mikheeva
St. Petersburg
References
1. General Conference for Weights and Measures (CGPM), Resolution 1 of 26 meeting of CGPM (13–16 November 2018), available at: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/26-2018/resolution-1 (accessed: 23.06.21).
2. Marquardt R., Meija J., Mester Z., et al. Defi nition of the mole (IUPAC Recommendation 2017), Pure Appl. Chem., 2018, vol. 90, nо. 1, рр. 175–180.
3. Richard J. C Brown, Paul J. Brewer, Metrologia, 2020, vol. 57 (6), p. 065002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab9db7
4. John R. de Laeter, John Karl Böhlke, P. De Bièvre, H. Hidaka, H. S. Peiser, K. J. R. Rosman, P. D. P. Taylor, Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report), De Gruyter, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683
5. International Committee for Weights and Measures, Proceedings of Session I of the 104th meeting, 9–10 March 2015, available at: https://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/CIPM/CIPM2015-I-EN.pdf (accessed: 13.11.18).
6. Konopelko L. A., Chubchenko Y. K., International Conference Laser Optics (ICLO), 2018, pp. 288–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/LO.2018.8435389
7. Viallon J. et al., Metrologia, vol. 57 (5), p. 055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab948c
8. Flores E. et al., Comparison of isotope ratio measurement capabilities for CO2: sample preparation and characterization by isotope ratio infrared spectroscopy, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 2020, p. 8518.
9. Konopelko L. A., Migal P. V., Sobina E. P., Razrabotka etalonov sravneniya v vide metallov vysokoj chistoty, Etalony. Standartnye obrazcy, 2019, vol. 15 (2), pp. 15–24. (In Russ.)
10. Jochen Vogl, Heinrich Kipphardt, Hans-Joachim Heinrich, Egor Sobina, Tatiana Tabatchikova, CCQM-P107.1 Purity of Zinc with respect to six defi ned metallic analytes, BAM Federal institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Draft Report, 2014.
11. Jochen Vogl at. al., CCQM-P149 Purity determination of zinc to be used as primary standard for zinc determination, BAM Federal institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Draft B, 2016.
12. Vogl J., CCQM-IAWG17-28 Roadmap for the purity determination of pure metallic elements. Basic principles and helpful advice, 2017, available at: https://www.bipm.org/wg/CCQM/IAWG/Allowed/April_2017/CCQM-IAWG17-28.pdf (accessed: 03.02.2021).
13. Mikheeva A. Y., Krylov A. I., Proslezhivaemost’ v organicheskom analize. Chast 1: Edinstvo izmereniy i sopostavimost’ nacionalnih I mezhdunarodnih etalonov, Etalony. Standartnye obrazcy, 2019, vol. 16 (3), pp. 5–22. (In Russ.)
14. Faruqui N., Kummrow A., Fu B., Divieto C., Rojas F., Kisulu F., Cavalcante J. J. V., Wang J., Campbell J., Martins J. L., Choi J.-H., Sassi M. P., Zucco M., Vonsky M., Vessillier S., Zou S., Fujii S.-I., Ryadnov M. G., Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2020, vol. 7, р. 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00456
15. Kolobova А. V., Konopelko L. А., Popov О. G., Etalony. Standartnye obrazcy, 2019, vol. 16 (3), pp. 23–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20915/2687-0886-2020-16-3-23-35
Review
For citations:
Konopelko L.A., Kustikov Y.A., Okrepilov M.V., Kolobova A.V., Migal P.V., Krylov A.I., Vonskiy M.S., Chubchenko I.K., Efremova O.V., Kulyabina E.V., Dobrovolskiy V.I., Mikheeva A.Y. Development of international key comparisons in the field of chemico-analytical measurements. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(7):65-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-7-65-72