|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
State verification scheme for means of measuring DC and AC electrical resistance
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-5-26-30
Abstract
The need to develop a new state verification scheme (SVS) is caused by the emergence of high-precision bridges, resistance measures and boxes with a low temperature coefficient (0,02–0,5) ppm/К, highly stable transient measures, electronic resistance calibrators, and high frequency resistance measures. Recommendations how to assign the status of a working standard to measures, R-meters and measuring shunts with accuracy from 0,005 % to 0,500 %, sufficient for verification of measuring instruments, are given. SVS consists of two parts: part 1 covers electrical resistance measures, boxes and R-meters, part 2 – to measuring shunts and shunt resistance meters. Part 2 was introduced to the SVS for the first time. The revised indicators of accuracy for working standards of all levels are considered, conditions for the investigation of measuring instruments for assigning the status of a working standard, criteria for assessing metrological characteristics are given.
About the Authors
M. D. Klionsky
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mark D. Klionsky
St. Petersburg
I. A. Samodurov
D. I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor A. Samodurov
St. Petersburg
References
1. Samodurov I. A., Сollection of reports of the 75th International Scientifi c and Technical Conference, 2020, St. Petersburg, pp. 264–265, available at: https://conf-tores.etu.ru/assets/files/2020/cp/pages/s11.html(accesed:24.04.2020).(In Russ.)
2. Semenov Y., Samodurov I., CPEM 2010, Daejeon, Korea (South), 2010, pp. 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2010.5544296
3. Lisowski M., Krawczyk K., IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, June 2013, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1749– 1754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2250132
4. Jarrett D. G., Dupree A. J., CPEM 2010, Daejeon, Korea (South), 2010, pp. 571–572. https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2010.5544805
5. Jarret D. G., Kraft M.E., 10 TΩ and 100 TΩ resistance measurements at NIST, X-Semetro Congress, Digest, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Sept. 25–27, 2013.
6. Jeckelmann B., Zeier M., Metrologia, 2010, vol. 47, 01006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/47/1A/01006
7. Bohacek J., Wood B. M., Metrologia, 2001, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2000.850932
8. Awan S. A., Kibble B. P., IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, April 2005, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2005.843582
9. Filipski P. S., Boecker M., Garcocz M., 2007 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007, Warsaw, Poland, 2007, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2007.379124
10. Klionsky M. D., Shipelev K. I., Сollection of reports of the 75th International Scientifi c and Technical Conference 2020, St. Petersburg, pp. 262–263, available at: https://confntores.etu.ru/assets/files/2020/cp/pages/s11.html(accesed:24.04.2020).(In Russ.)
11.
Review
For citations:
Klionsky M.D., Samodurov I.A. State verification scheme for means of measuring DC and AC electrical resistance. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(5):26-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-5-26-30
Views:
167
Email this article 