Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
A study of high transient voltage unit realization uncertainty
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-10-49-53
Abstract
The problem of metrological support of high-voltage pulse generators with subnanosecond rise time, as well as pulse voltage dividers used in power engineering, aviation and rocket-space industries, has been solved. As a result of the modernization of the State primary special standard of transient electric and magnetic field strengths units with a pulse rise time in the range of 0.1–10.0 ns GET 148-2013, a mode of realization a unit of high transient electric voltage with a minimum pulse rise time of 100 ps was implemented. Uncertainties of high transient electric voltage unit realization obtained by numerical simulations using the Monte Carlo method, as well as in accordance with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement (GUM), are estimated. Also, the error of a unit realization was estimated in accordance with GOST 8.381-2009 “GSI. Standards. Methods to Express Accuracy”.
About the Authors
A. V. Sukhov
All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Sukhov
Moscow
K. Yu. Sakharov
All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin Yu. Sakharov
Moscow
Yu. M. Zolotarevsky
All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuri M. Zolotarevsky
Moscow
O. V. Mikheev
All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg V. Mikheev
Moscow
V. A. Turkin
All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Turkin
Moscow
References
1. Efanov V. M., Efanov M. V., Yarin P., Komashko A., Arbuzov A., Dyublov A., Pulse power supplies for power lasers based on FID technology, Abstracts IEEE Int. Conf. on Plasma Science (ICOPS), San-Francisco, USA, 16–21 June 2013, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6634864
2. Korotkov S. V., Aristov Yu. V., Voronkov V. B., Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 2010, vol. 53, pp. 230–232. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441210020132
3. Apeksimov D. V., Zhukov I. A., Sklonin A. V., Сollection of reports of the VIII All-Russian Scientifi c and Technical Conference “Ehlektromagnitnaya sovmestimost’”, 2019, pp. 155–157.
4. Ryu J., Kwon H., Park S. H., and Yim D. W., IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2016, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 680–684. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2015.2510551
5. Balyuk N. V., Pertsev S. F., Orlov S. D., Technologies of electromagnetic compatibility, 2020, no. 1(72), pp. 31–38.
6. Agapov E. V., Zarutskiy A. O., Zelensky I. I., Krasnoperov D. B., Olenevskiy V. V., Pashkov A. Yu., Plygach V. A., Samsonov G. V., Technologies of electromagnetic compatibility, 2020, no. 1(72), pp. 97–108.
7. Sakharov K. Y., Mikheev O. V., Turkin V. A., Sukhov A. V., Dobrotvorskii M. I., Measurement Techniques, 2019, vol. 61, pp. 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-019-01534-z
8. Sukhov A. V., Sakharov K. Y., Mikheev O. V., Turkin V. A., Ugolev V. L., Denisov M. Yu., Rodin R. A., Measurement Techniques, 2018, vol. 61, pp. 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-018-1475-5
9. Possolo A., Iyer H. K., Review of Scientifi c Instruments, 2017, vol. 88, pp. 011301-1-33. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974274
10. Zakharov I. P, Vodotika S. V., Information Processing Systems, 2008, no. 4(71), pp. 34–37.
Review
For citations:
Sukhov A.V., Sakharov K.Yu., Zolotarevsky Yu.M., Mikheev O.V., Turkin V.A. A study of high transient voltage unit realization uncertainty. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2020;(10):49-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-10-49-53
Views:
121
Email this article 