

Highly sensitive magnetic resonance compatible temperature measurement system
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-5-66-71
Abstract
One of the steps in determining the compliance of an implantable medical device with the safety requirements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the experimental assessment of its heating over the course of the study. However, the application of traditional methods, such as thermocouple measurements or radiation thermometry, is difficult in connection with the conditions of high magnetic fields. A spectrometric system is proposed for measuring temperature in a magnetic resonance imaging cabinet with sensitivity of 0.01 °C and error of 0.1 % in the range of 10–50 °C. Temperature sensors are Fabry–Perot interferometers formed by flat ends of optical fibers located at a distance of about tens of micrometers. A design of the sensor and a calibration method are described. A design of the sensor and a calibration method are described. The system was tested in the process of two passive implants heating in 1,5 T MRI. As a result, compliance with the accepted recommendations for assessing the heating of implantable medical devices in MRI was demonstrated, and the temperature rise value was obtained that was comparable to the manufacturer’s tests of this product according to ASTM F 2182. The presented measurement system can be used to assess the MR-compatibility of implantable medical devices, to develop scanning protocols for patients with metal structures, as well as to confirm or refine mathematical models of heat transfer.
About the Authors
D. S. SemenovRussian Federation
Dmitry S. Semenov
Moscow
V. A. Yatseev
Russian Federation
Vasily A. Yatseev
Moscow
E. S. Akhmad
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Akhmad
Moscow
Yu. A. Vasilev
Russian Federation
Yurij A. Vasilev
Moscow
K. A. Sergunova
Russian Federation
Kristina A. Sergunova
Moscow
A. V. Petraikin
Russian Federation
Alexey V. Petraikin
Moscow
References
1. Elder J. A., Cahill D. F., Biological Eff ects of Radiofrequency Radiation. Research Triangle Park N. C.: Health Eff ects Research Laboratory, Offi ce of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1984, 250 p.
2. Shellock F. G., Schaefer D. J., Gordon C. J., Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1986, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 644–647. 3. Shellock F. G., Magnetic resonance quarterly, 1989, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 243–261.
3. Shellock F. G., Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2000, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30–36. DOI:10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<30:aid-jmri4>3.0.co;2-s
4. ASTM F 2182-11a standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating on or near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging, available at:https://www.astm.org/Standards/F2182.htm(accessed:24.04.2018).
5. Feng D. X., McCauley J. P., Morgan-Curtis F. K., Salam R. A., Pennel D. R., British Journal of Radiology, 2015, vol. 88, no. 1056, 20150633. DOI:10.1259/bjr.20150633
6. Sergunova K. A., Akhmad E. S., Petraikin A. V., Kivasev S. A., Semenov D. S., Vasilev Yu. A., Morozov S. P., Vladzimirsky A. V., Nizovtsova L. A., The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center Cardiovascular Diseases, 2019, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 313–323. DOI:10.24022/1810-0694-2019-20-4-313-323
7. Vasilev Yu. A., Semenov D. S., Yatseev V. A., Akhmad E. S., Petryakin A. V., Marusina M. Ya., Kurlaeva Yu. N., Scientifi c and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 173–179. DOI:10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-1-173-179
8. Panych L. P., Madore B., Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2018, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 28–43. DOI:10.1002/jmri.25761
9. Armenean C., Perrin E., Armenean M., Beuf O., Pilleul F., Saint-Jalmes H., Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004, no. 52, pp. 1200–1206. DOI:10.1002/mrm.20246
10. Neufeld E., Kühn S., Szekely G., Kuster N., Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2009, vol. 54, no. 13, pp. 4151–4169. DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/54/13/012
11. Butov O. V., Dianov E. M., Golant K. M., Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, vol. 17, pp. 975–979. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/17/5/S06
12. Ramakrishnan M., Rajan G., Semenova Y., Farrell G., Sensors, 2016, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–126. DOI:10.3390/s16010099
13. Korolyov V. A., Potapov V. T., Biomedical Engineering, 2012, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 7–82.
14. Sokolov A. N, Yatseev V. A., Light Wave Russ, 2006, no. 4, pp. 44–46 (in Russian).
15. Zotov A. M., Korolenko P. V., Yatseev V. A., Sensors&Systems, 2018, no. 4, pp. 29–33 (in Russian).
16. Butov O. V., Bazakutsa A. P., Chamorovskiy Y. K., Fedorov A. N., Shevtsov I. A., Sensors, 2019, 19(19), 4228. DOI:10.3390/s19194228.17
17. Butov O. V., Results in Physics, 2019, vol. 15, 102542. DOI:10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102542
18. Vasil’ev S. A., Medvedkov O. I., Korolev I. G., Quantum Electronics, 2005, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1085–1103. DOI:10.1070/QE2005v035n12ABEH013041
Review
For citations:
Semenov D.S., Yatseev V.A., Akhmad E.S., Vasilev Yu.A., Sergunova K.A., Petraikin A.V. Highly sensitive magnetic resonance compatible temperature measurement system. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2020;(5):66-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-5-66-71