

Control algorithms in quantum frequency standards based on the effect of coherent population trapping
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-1-27-31
Abstract
The problem of developing control algorithms in quantum frequency standards based on the effect of coherent population trapping is considered. The development of such algorithms will make it possible to create frequency standards with metrological characteristics that are not inferior to the characteristics of rubidium frequency standards, with reduced power consumption and overall dimensions. A method for studying the dependence of the actual value and frequency instability of quantum frequency standards based on the effect of coherent population trapping on the operating modes of individual parts of the standards is presented. As a criterion for optimizing the laser injection current, the output power of the microwave generator, and the cell temperature, we chose to minimize the effect on the shift of the actual frequency of the standard. A comparative analysis of methods for changing the radiation intensity of a surface-emitting laser with a vertical resonator has been carried out and control algorithms have been developed that take into account the features of these methods. Based on these algorithms, software and tuning methods have been developed in quantum frequency standards based on the effect of coherent population trapping. For the prototype standard, the results of measuring the frequency instability are shown. It is shown that control algorithms and tuning methods can qualitatively change the metrological characteristics of quantum frequency standards based on the effect of coherent population trapping.
About the Author
D. A. ParyohinRussian Federation
Danil A. Paryohin
Mendeleevo, Moscow region
References
1. Svenja Knappe, Robert Wynands, John Kitching, Hugh G. Robinson, and Leo Hollberg, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 2001, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.18.001545
2. Arimondo E., Progress in Optic, 1996, vol. 35, pp. 257–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6638(08)70531-6
3. Stähler M., Wynands R., Knappe S., Kitching J., Hollberg L., Taichenachev A., Yudin V., Optics Letters, 2002, vol. 27, pp. 1472–1474. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.001472
4. Aff olderbach C., Droz F., Mileti G., IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2006, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2006.870331
5. Kozlova O., Danet J., Guérandel S., E. de Clercq, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2014, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1863–1870. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014.2298672
6. Vanier J., Kunski R., Cyr N., Savard J., Tetu M., Journal of Applied Physics, 1982, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 5387–5391. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.331467
7. Krzewick W., Mitchell J., Bollettiero J., Cash P., Wellwood K., Kosvin I., Zanca L., Proceedings of the 2020 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California, January 2020, pp. 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.33012/2020.17198
8. Lutwak R., Vlitas P., Varghese M., Mescher M., Serkland D. K., Peake G. M., Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and Exposition, 2005., Vancouver, BC, 2005, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FREQ.2005.1574029
9. Knappe S., Gerginov V., Schwindt P. D. D., Shah V., Robinson H. G., Hollberg L., and Kitching J., Optics Letters, 2005, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 2351–2353. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.002351
10. Zhao J., Liu R., Meng H., Hu E., He C., Wang Z., Progress towards chip-scale atomic clock in Peking University, 2017 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS), 2017, Besancon, pp. 611–613. https://doi.org/10.1109/FCS.2017.8088973
Review
For citations:
Paryohin D.A. Control algorithms in quantum frequency standards based on the effect of coherent population trapping. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2021;(1):27-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-1-27-31