Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The model of viscosity measurement by the non-contact aerohydrodynamic method
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-11-57-64
Abstract
A brief review of non-contact methods for viscosity measurement is given. It is shown that it is reasonable to use the pulse aerohydrodynamic method for the measurement of high viscosity (more than 10 Pa·s). The essence of the method is presented, it consists in deforming the tested liquid surface with a gas jet and determining the viscosity from the time takes to reach a predetermined degree of deformation from the moment when the jet was applied. The two models and two functions of the viscosity measurements are theoretically obtained for the pulsed aerohydrodynamic method. The theoretical evaluation of the lower measurement limit is performed. We conduct the experimental research of two viscosity measurement models at the aerodynamic action angles of 20° and 50° with the compensation of transient process in the moment of a solenoid valve opening and without it. It is found that to determine the viscosity by the time of the liquid surface deformation it is reasonable to apply the linear measurement function, not to use the compensation of transient process in the pneumatics, and utilize the aerodynamic action at angle of 20–30° to the liquid surface. It is experimentally proved that the viscosity measurement relative error is not more than 3 % in the interval of 0.5–100 Pa·s. The results is necessary for increase in the operability of liquid viscosity measurement in machine, paint, coating, food, chemical, electrical, and petroleum industries.
About the Authors
A. P. Savenkov
Tambov State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr P. Savenkov
Tambov
V. A. Sychev
NPO “MIELTA TECHNOLOGII”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav A. Sychev
Tambov
References
1. Домостроев А. В., Демьянов А. А., Клим О. В., Юдченко Д. А. Сравнительные исследования поточных вибрационных вискозиметров нефти // Измерительная техника. 2013. № 3. С. 62–66 [Domostroev A. V., Dem’yanov A. A., Klim O. V., Yudchenko D. A., Measurement. Techniques, 2013, vol.56, nо. 3, pp.337–343.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-013-0206-1 ]
2. Соломин Б. А., Черторийский А. А., Конторович М. Л., Низаметдинов А. М. Аппаратно-программный комплекс для оперативного исследования теплофизических свойств жидкости // Измерительная техника. 2014. № 3. С. 49–52. [Solomin B. A., Chertoriiskii A. A., Kontorovich M. L., Nizametdinov A. M., Measurement. Techniques, 2017, vol. 57, nо. 3, pp. 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-014-0451-y ]
3. Chaudhary K., Munjal P., Singh K. P., Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, no. 14365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93729-0
4. Banks R. B., Chandrasekhara D. V., J. Fluid Mech., 1963, vol. 15, part 1, pp. 13−34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112063000021
5. Савенков А. П., Сычёв В. А. Исследование реакции поверхности жидкости на импульсное воздействие наклонной газовой струи при малых числах Рейнольдса // Журнал технической физики. 2022. Т. 92. Вып. 2. С. 216–224. https://doi.org/10.21883/JTF.2022.02.52010.251-21 [Savenkov A. P., Sychev V. A., Tech. Phys., 2022, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 183–190. https://doi.org/10.21883/TP.2022.02.52944.251-21 ]
6. Савенков А. П., Мордасов М. М., Сычёв В. А. Бесконтактное пневмоэлектрическое устройство для измерений вязкости жидкостей // Измерительная техника. 2020. № 9. С. 43–49. https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-9-43-49 [Savenkov A. P., Mordasov M. M., Sychev V. A., Measurement Techniques, 2020, vol. 63, nо. 9, pp. 722–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01845-0 ]
7. Herlach D. M., Cochrane R. F., Egry I., Fecht H. J., Greer A. L., Int. Mater. Rev., 1993, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 273–347. https://doi.org/10.1179/095066093790326267
8. Li L. H., Hu L., Yang S. J., Wang W. L., Wei B., J. Appl. Phys., 2016, vol. 119, no. 035902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940243
9. Xue S., Dong W., Chen D., Guo Q., He H., Yu J., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2021, vol. 92, no. 065111. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0026974
10. Beckers M., Engelhardt M., Schneider S., High Temp. – High Press., 2021, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 167–184. https://doi.org/10.32908/hthp.v50.1031
11. Langstaff D., Gunn M., Greaves G. N., Marsing A., Kargl F., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2013, vol. 84, no. 124901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4832115
12. Kremer J., Kilzer A., Petermann M., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2018, vol. 89, no. 015109. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4998796
13. Sohl C. H., Miyano K., Ketterson J. B., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1978, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1464–1469. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1135288
14. Behroozi F., Smith J., Even W., Am. J. Phys., 2010, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1165–1169. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3467887
15. Koller T. M., Kerscher M., Fröba A. P., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, vol. 626, pp. 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.129
16. Nishimura Y., Hasegawa A., Nagasaka Y., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2014, vol. 85, no. 044904, 11 p. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871992
17. Eguchi M., Taguchi Y., Nagasaka Y., Opt. Express, 2018, vol. 26, no. 26, pp. 34070–34080. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.034070
18. Taylor M. A., Kijas A. W., Wang Z., Lauko J., Rowan A. E., Biomed. Opt. Express, 2021, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 6259–6268. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.435869
19. Postnov D. D., Moller F., Sosnovtseva O., PLoS ONE, 2018, vol. 13(9), e0203141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203141
20. Chan J., Raghunath A., Michaelsen K. E., Gollakota S., Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2022, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3:1–3:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517256
21. Verma G., Yadav G., Saraj C. S., Li L., Miljkovic N., Delville J. P., Li W., Light: Sci. Appl., 2022, vol. 11, no. 115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00796-7
22. Yoshitake Y., Mitani, S., Sakai, K., Takagi, K., J. Appl. Phys., 2005, vol. 97, no. 024901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839640
23. Shimokawa Y., Sakai K., Phys. Rev. E, 2013, vol. 87, no. 063009. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.063009
24. Гализдра В. И., Мордасов М. М. Двухфазная система «струя газа – жидкость» в измерении вязкости жидких сред // Вестник ТГТУ. 1999. Т. 5. № 2. С. 218–227. [Galizdra V. I., Mordasov M. M., Dvuhfaznaya sistema “struya gaza – zhidkost’” v izmerenii vyazkosti zhidkih sred, Transactions TSTU, 1999, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 218–227. (In Russ.)]
25. Гребенникова Н. М., Мордасов М. М. Пневматический метод контроля вязкости жидкостей // Вестник ТГТУ. 2005. Т. 11. № 1А. С. 81–87 [Grebennikova N. M., Mordasov M. M., Pnevmaticheskij metod kontrolya vyazkosti zhidkostej, Transactions TSTU, 2005, vol. 11, no. 1А, pp. 81–87. (In Russ.) ]
26. Мордасов М. М., Савенков А. П., Сафонова М. Э., Сычев В. А. Бесконтактное триангуляционное измерение расстояния до зеркальных поверхностей // Автометрия. 2018. Т. 54. № 1. С. 80–88. https://doi.org/10.15372/AUT20180111 [Mordasov M. M., Savenkov A. P., Safonova M. E., Sychev V. A., Optoelectron. Instrum. Data Process., 2018, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 69–75. https://doi.org/10.3103/S8756699018010119 ]
27. Mishchenko S. V., Mordasov M. M., Savenkov A. P., Safonova M. E., Sychev V. A., Advanced Materials & Technologies, 2019, no. 3(15), pp. 50–55. https://doi.org/10.17277/amt.2019.03.pp.050-055
28. Мищенко С. В., Мордасов М. М., СавенковА. П., СычёвВ. А. Исследования влияния размеров сосуда с жидкостью на показания вискозиметра Брукфильда // Измерительная техника. 2020. № 4. С. 33–38. https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-4-33-38 [Mischenko S. V., Mordasov M. M., Savenkov A. P., Sychev V. A., Measurement Techniques, 2020, vol. 63, nо. 4, pp. 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01784-2 ]
Review
For citations:
Savenkov A.P., Sychev V.A. The model of viscosity measurement by the non-contact aerohydrodynamic method. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2022;(11):57-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-11-57-64
Views:
132
Email this article 