

Infuence of the dynamic goniometer’s bearing on the measurement error
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-8-52-57
Abstract
In order to improve the accuracy of the dynamic goniometer, the influence of its bearing on the measurement error was studied. The spectral characteristics of the random error of two dynamic goniometers with the same optical angle encoders and different bearings, aerostatic and angular contact ball bearings, are studied. It is shown that the use of a ball bearing in the goniometer leads to non-stationarity of the random error of angular measurements. Using wavelet analysis and Allan variation, the random error of the dynamic goniometer is analyzed, the sources of nonstationarity are identified, and its potential accuracy is determined. It has been established that the use of an aerostatic bearing makes it possible to increase the accuracy of a dynamic goniometer and bring its value closer to the accuracy of a static goniometer, in which the influence of the bearing assembly is minimized. The results obtained are of interest to users and developers of dynamic goniometers.
About the Authors
P. A. PavlovRussian Federation
Petr A. Pavlov
St. Petersburg
E. M. Ivashchenko
Russian Federation
Elena M. Ivashchenko
St. Petersburg
References
1. Pavlov P. A., Filatov Yu. V., Burnashev M. N., etc., Nauka I obrazovanie: technologii uspecha, Proceedings of the International Conference, St. Petersburg, 2016, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical Univercity “LETI”, 2016, pp. 63–67. (In Russ.)
2. Bokhman E. D., Ivanov P. A., Larichev R. A., et al, Gyroscopy Navigation, 2019, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075108719030039
3. Allan D.W., Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proc. IEEE, 1966, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 221–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4634
4. Mary Beth Ruskai, Gregory Beylkin, etc., Wavelets and their Applications, Boston, Jones and Barlett Publisher, 1992, 474 p.
5. Yakovlev A. N., Vvedenie v vejvlet preobrazovanija [Introduction to wavelet transforms], Novosibirsk, NGTU Publ., 2003, 104 p. (In Russ.)
6. Voskobojnikov Yu. V., Vejvlet fi ltrazija signalov I izobrazhenij (s primerami MathCad): monografi ya, Novosibirsk, NGASY (Sibstrin) Publ., 2015, 188 p. (In Russ.)
7. Anurjev V. I., Spravochnik konstruktora-mashinostroitelya [The handbook of designer-mechanician], Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 2001, 920 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kosminin S. V., Chernobai S. P., Analiz tochnosti vrashcheniya vysokoskorostnyh shpindelej s gazostaticheskimi oporami, STIN, 2006, no. 6, pp. 10–13. (In Russ.)
9. Machov A. A., Pozdnyak G. G., Dinamicheskaya model’ shpindelya na aerostaticheskih oporah, Vestnik RUDN, ser. Inzhenernie issledovanija, 2004, no. 1(8), pp. 76–82. (In Russ.)
10. J. S. Bendat, A.G. Piersol, Random Data Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1986.
11. Siraya T. N., Gyroscopy Navig., 2020, vol. 11, pp. 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207510872002007
Review
For citations:
Pavlov P.A., Ivashchenko E.M. Infuence of the dynamic goniometer’s bearing on the measurement error. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2022;(8):52-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-8-52-57