Preview

Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Results of the COOMET 706/RU-а/16 pilot comparison of national standards of the unit of propagation velocity of longitudinal ultrasonic waves in solids

https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2023-4-63-70

Abstract

The results of comparisons of national standards of the unit of propagation velocity of longitudinal ultrasonic waves in solids are presented (COOMET 706/RU-a/16 pilot comparisons). Comparisons were made in 2018–2021 with the participation of national metrological institutes of Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and China. The main purpose of these comparisons was to check the measuring capabilities of the participating laboratories, analyze the components of measurement uncertainty, evaluation the reproducibility of measurement results, as well as test the travelling transfer standards, schedules and methods of their transportation. For the fi rst time in the metrology of acoustic measurements in solids, comparisons of six national standards were carried out, in which various methods of excitation and registration of ultrasound (non-contact optical and capacitive methods, immersion piezoelectric method) and various methods of measuring the propagation velocity of longitudinal ultrasonic waves in solids (pulse echo, resonance, through-transmission substitution technique) were implemented. Given the stable reference block characteristics, a hybrid comparison scheme is decided upon. Six test blocks (velocity measures) made of quartz glass, BK8 optical glass and 40X13 steel have been chosen as travelling transfer standards. The measurements of the propagation velocity of longitudinal ultrasonic waves in test blocks were performed at the frequencies 2.25–2.5, 5 and 10 MHz in accordance with the measurement procedure adopted on this standard. The comparisons showed the consistency of most of the measurement results obtained in the participating laboratories. Individual discrepancies in the results of the comparisons may be related to the possible underestimation of the quoted standard uncertainties of measurements by the comparisons participants, as well as the presence of unaccounted for infl uencing factors, which requires additional studies to determine the causes.

About the Authors

P. V. Bazylev
Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Petr V. Bazylev

Khabarovsk



V. А. Lugovoi
Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering; Mining Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Vladimir А. Lugovoi

Khabarovsk



References

1. Lugovoi V. A., Romanko A. A., Shulatov A. V. Kontrol. Diagnostika [Testing. Diagnostics], 2021, no. 12, pp. 42–45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14489/td.2021.12.pp.042-045

2. Ivashchenko A. P. Operating experience of the installation for measurements of velocity of ultrasonic oscillations “UISU-01”, available at: https://www.ndt.com.ua/ru/support/standartizatsiyai-metrologiya/uisu-01 (accessed: 16.11.2022).

3. Ermolov I. N., Lange Yu. V. Ultrazvukovoj kontrol [Ultrasonic monitoring] in: Klyuev V. V. (ed.) Nerazrushayushchij kontrol [Nondestructive Testing], Handbook. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 2004, vol. 3. 864 p. (In Russ.)

4. Krautkrämer J., Krautkrämer H. Ultrasonic testing of materials. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1990, 677 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8

5. Bazylev P. V., Doronin I. S., Kondratiev A. I., Krumgolts I. Ya., Lugovoi V. A., Okishev K. N. Measurement Techniques, 2016, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-016-0990-5

6. Bazylev P. V., Kondratiev A. I., Lugovoi V. A. Original installation for complex measurement of acoustic parameters in condensed media, Reports of 10th European Conference on Non- Destructive Testing (ECNDT 2010), Moscow, Russia, June 7–11, 2010, Moscow, available at: http://www.idspektr.ru/10_ECNDT/reports/4_05_04.pdf (accessed: 16.11.2022).

7. Guangzhen Xing, Ping Yang, Longbiao He. Ultrasonics, 2013, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 825–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.001

8. Gusakov S. A., Kondratiev A. I. Measurement Techniques, 1989, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110942

9. Cox M. G. Metrologia, 2002, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/39/6/10

10. Arkhipov V. I., Bondarenko A. N., Drobot Y. B., Trotsenko V. P. Measurement Techniques, 1984, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 177–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00828674

11. Kondratiev A. I. Akusticheskij zhurnal, 1990, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 470–476. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Bazylev P.V., Lugovoi V.А. Results of the COOMET 706/RU-а/16 pilot comparison of national standards of the unit of propagation velocity of longitudinal ultrasonic waves in solids. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2023;(4):63-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2023-4-63-70

Views: 172


ISSN 0368-1025 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5237 (Online)