

Comparative analysis of methods for determining the parameters of the measuring transducer of a contact conductometer
https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-1-46-51
Abstract
The issues of increasing the accuracy of contact conductometers are considered. The main sources of error of the primary measuring transducer of the contact conductometer are described, which include the solution resistance, as well as the polarization resistance and the capacity of the electric double layer, which characterize the electrochemical processes on the electrodes of the transducer. Methods for determining the specified parameters affecting the impedance of the primary measuring transducer are proposed. The first method is based on the analysis of the amplitude-frequency characteristics of the active impedance component of the conductive constant cell of the contact conductometer filled with a solution. The second method is based on determining the active component of the impedance of the solution at the resonance frequency, at which the reactive component of its impedance is equal to zero. A third method is proposed, in which the active component of the solution impedance is determined at three different frequencies. It is noted that the second method can reliably determine only the active resistance of the solution. Constant cells are determined by the first and third methods in the same frequency range; the second method uses a frequency several times higher than the upper limit of this frequency range. It is shown that the results obtained by the second and third methods practically coincide and differ significantly from the constant cell found by the first method.
About the Authors
B. S. PervukhinRussian Federation
Boris S. Pervukhin
Barnaul
D. E. Krivobokov
Russian Federation
Dmitry E. Krivobokov
Barnaul
V. A. Solov'ev
Russian Federation
Vitali A. Solov'ev
Barnaul
References
1. Pervukhin B. S., Methodological error of contact conductors, Natural and technical sciences, 2011, no. 1, pp. 176–182. (In Russ.)
2. Greeliches M. S., Filanovsky B. K., Contact conductometry. Theory and practice of the method, Leningrad, Himiya Publ., 1980. 176 p. (In Russ.)
3. Latvian K. P., Analysis of basic circuits of contact conductometers, Bulletin of Tambov State Technical University. Analytical chemistry, 2006, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 647–653. (In Russ.)
4. Solovyov V. A., Krivobokov D. E., Measurement Techniques, 2018, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-018-1318-4
5. Stoynov Z. B., Grafov B. M., et al, Electrochemical impedance, Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, 336 p. (In Russ.)
6. Dubrovsky I. A., Cardiac electrode impedance model, Medical engineering, 2010, no. 4, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.)
7. Kagirov A. G., Romanenko S. V., Measuring the active component of the electrochemical impedance of solutions using a miniature two-electrode conductometric cell, Bulletin of Science of Siberia, 2012, no. 3 (4), pp. 68–73. (In Russ.)
8. Pervukhin B. S., Measurement Techniques, 2008. no. 3, рр. 61–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-008-9023-3
9. Pervukhin B. S., Krivobokov D. E., Suvorova N. V., Determination of parameters of contact conductometric cells, Polzunovsky almanac, 2014, no. 1, pp. 63–65. (In Russ.)
10. Kilimnik A. B., Slobina E. S., Resonant oscillation frequencies of hydrated sodium, potassium and chlorine ions in mixtures of solutions of potassium and sodium chlorides, Bulletin of Tambov State Technical University. Physical chemistry, 2015, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 624–629. (In Russ.)
11. Kilimnik A. B., Oscillatory processes in a double electric layer when AC is applied, Bulletin of Tambov State Technical University, 2006, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 586–587. (In Russ.)
12. Kilimnik A. B., Slobina E. S., Eff ects of concentration and temperature on resonant oscillation frequencies of hydrated ions Cu2+ and 2−SO4 and reactive components of impedance, Bulletin of Tambov State Technical University. Physical chemistry, 2012, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 379–385. (In Russ.)
13. Kilimnik A. B., Yarmolenko V. V., Conductometric cell for determining reactive impedance components, Bulletin of Tambov State Technical University. Physical chemistry, 2007, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 51–56. (In Russ.)
14. Thirstrup C., Snedden A., Deleebeeck L., Measurement Science and Technology, 2017, vol. 28, no 12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa875d
15. Jaffrezic-Renault N., Dzyadevych S. V., Sensors, 2008, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2569–2588. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8042569
Review
For citations:
Pervukhin B.S., Krivobokov D.E., Solov'ev V.A. Comparative analysis of methods for determining the parameters of the measuring transducer of a contact conductometer. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2022;(1):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-1-46-51