Preview

Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Results of pilot comparisons of amplitude-phase calibrations of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-а/19

https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2023-3-67-72

Abstract

Initiated by COOMET TC 1.2 “Acoustics, Ultrasound, Vibration” bilateral pilot comparisons of amplitude-phase calibrations of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19 between the Hangzhou Research Institute of Applied Acoustics (HAARI) and the Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering (pilot laboratory) are described. Characteristics of reference hydrophones, information about standard facilities and methods of calibration, results of calibrations, and estimates of reference levels of comparisons are given. The results of comparisons are discussed. The problems that infl uenced the results of comparisons are mentioned. The correctness of the measurement methods used by the participants of the comparisons, including the method of calculating the frequency dependence of the argument of hydrophone complex sensitivity from the experimental frequency dependence of the modulus of its sensitivity, was confirmed. The results of the pilot comparisons were found to be satisfactory. When discussing the results of comparisons at the COOMET TC 1.2 meeting, it was proposed to conduct additional comparisons of the results of amplitude-phase calibrations in an expanded composition of participants. The results obtained make it possible to verify the correctness of the adopted new technical solutions, to work out methods for performing measurements and post-processing of the obtained data, to identify and numerically evaluate sources of uncertainty, and also to establish previously unaccounted sources of uncertainty when improving primary standards.

About the Authors

A. E. Isaev
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Alexander E. Isaev

Mendeleevo, Moscow region



Yi Chen
HAARI
China

Chen Yi

Hangzhou, Fuyang Zhejiang



A. N. Matveev
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Anton N. Matveev

Mendeleevo, Moscow region



Guanghui Jia
HAARI
China

Jia Guanghui

Hangzhou, Fuyang Zhejiang



B. I. Khatamtaev
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Bulat I. Khatamtaev

Mendeleevo, Moscow region



Shiquan Wang
HAARI
China

Wang Shiquan

Hangzhou, Fuyang Zhejiang



N. G. Shcherblyuk
Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering
Russian Federation

Nikolay G. Shcherblyuk

Mendeleevo, Moscow region



References

1. Pete D. Theobald, Stephen P. Robinson, Alex D. Thompson, Roy C. Preston, Paul A., Wang Yuebing. J. Acoustical Society of America, 2005, vol. 118(5), pp. 3110–3116. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2063068

2. Pete D. Theobald, Stephen P. Robinson, Alex D. Thompson. The calibration of hydrophones by a novel optical technique in the frequency range 10 kHz to 600 kHz. Proc. 2nd International Conference “Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results”, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 28 June – 1 July 2005.

3. Gary Hayman, Yuebing Wang, Stephen Robinson. J. Acoustical Society of America, 2013, vol. 133(2), рр. 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4774272

4. Gary Hayman and Stephen P. Robinson. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 2012, vol. 17, 070026. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4770061

5. Luker L. D., Van Buren A. L. J. Acoustical Society of America, 1981, vol. 70, pp. 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.386715

6. Isaev A. E., Matveev A. N., Polikarpov A. M., Shcherblyuk N. G. Measurement Techniques, 2013, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-013-0269-z

7. Isaev A. E., Khatamtaev B. I. Measurement Techniques, 2021, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 580–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01974-6

8. Hayman G., Robinson S. Proceeding 11th Europ. Conf. on Underwater Acoustics, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2–6 July 2012, pp. 1437–1444. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4770061

9. Hayman G., Wang Y., Robinson S. P. J. Acoustical Society of America, 2013, vol. 133(2), pp. 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4774272

10. Isaev A. E., Сhen Yi, Matveev A. N., Jia Guanghui, Khatamtaev B. I., Wang Shiquan, Shcherblyuk N. G. COOMET 786/RU-a/19: results of pilot comparisons of hydrophones amplitude-phase free-fi eld calibrations in the frequency range from 10 to 500 kHz. Almanac of Modern Metrology, 2022, no. 4(32), рр. 151–168 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Isaev A.E., Chen Y., Matveev A.N., Jia G., Khatamtaev B.I., Wang Sh., Shcherblyuk N.G. Results of pilot comparisons of amplitude-phase calibrations of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-а/19. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2023;(3):67-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2023-3-67-72

Views: 154


ISSN 0368-1025 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5237 (Online)