izmertechИзмерительная техникаIzmeritel`naya Tekhnika0368-10252949-5237ФГУП "ВНИИФТРИ"izmertech-653Research ArticleОБЩИЕ ВОПРОСЫ МЕТРОЛОГИИ И ИЗМЕРИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕХНИКИGENERAL PROBLEMS OF METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUESПрименение техники байесовского усреднения для модели с фиксированными эффектами и линейным трендом при анализе ключевого сличения CCM.P-K12БоднарО. .olga.bodnar@ptb.ruЛинкА. .noemail@neicon.ruКлауэнбэргК. .noemail@neicon.ruЖустэнК. .noemail@neicon.ruЭльстэрК. .noemail@neicon.ruГосударственный физико-технический институтRussian Federation20130702202306711Copyright © ФГУП "ВНИИФТРИ", 20232023ФГУП "ВНИИФТРИ"ФГУП "ВНИИФТРИ"https://www.izmt.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.izmt.ru/jour/article/view/653

Выполнено обобщение процедуры оценивания данных на случай линейного дрейфа характеристик транспортируемого эталона. Процедура основана на методе байесовского усреднения моделей с фиксированными эффектами в предположении, что некоторое число лабораторий измеряет без смещения. Метод применен для оценивания данных ключевого сличения CCM.P-K12.

The recently proposed procedure data estimation is generalized for the case of linear drift of transported standard shows a linear drift. The procedure is based on Bayesian averaging of models with fixed effects inassumption that a certain number of laboratories measure without shift. The method has been applied for the key comparison CCM.P-K12 data estimation.

модель с фиксированными эффектамибайесовское усреднениявзвешенный метод наименьших квадратовсмещениеfixed effects modelBayesian averagingweighted least squaresmethodshiftReferencesElster C.,Toman B. Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories’ biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging//Metrologia.2010.V. 47. P. 113–119.Elster C.,Toman B. Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories’ biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging//Metrologia.2010.V. 47. P. 113–119.Ehrlich C. D. A note on flow rate and leak rate units // J. Vacuum Sci.& Technol.1986. V. A4. P.2384–2385.Ehrlich C. D. A note on flow rate and leak rate units // J. Vacuum Sci.& Technol.1986. V. A4. P.2384–2385.Jitschin W, Grosse G, Wandrey D. Diffusion leak artifacts as a secondary standard for gas flow// Vacuum.1988. V. 38. P. 883–886.Jitschin W, Grosse G, Wandrey D. Diffusion leak artifacts as a secondary standard for gas flow// Vacuum.1988. V. 38. P. 883–886.Hoeting J. A. e. a. Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial// Statistic. Sci.1999. V. 14. Р. 382–417.Hoeting J. A. e. a. Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial// Statistic. Sci.1999. V. 14. Р. 382–417.Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates issued by National Metrology Institutes (MRA).BIPM, 1999.Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates issued by National Metrology Institutes (MRA).BIPM, 1999.JCGM 101:2008 BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML.Evaluation of measurement data. Suppl. 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method.JCGM 101:2008 BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML.Evaluation of measurement data. Suppl. 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method.Kass R. E., Wasserman L. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules//J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1996. V. 91. P.1343–70.Kass R. E., Wasserman L. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules//J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1996. V. 91. P.1343–70.Harville D. A. Matrix Algebra from a Statistician's Perspective. N.Y.:Springer-Verlag, 1997.Harville D. A. Matrix Algebra from a Statistician's Perspective. N.Y.:Springer-Verlag, 1997.Chunovkina A. G.e. a.Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases//Metrologia.2008. V. 45. P. 211–216.Chunovkina A. G.e. a.Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases//Metrologia.2008. V. 45. P. 211–216.Sutton C. M. Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons//Metrologia.2004. V. 41. P. 272–277.Sutton C. M. Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons//Metrologia.2004. V. 41. P. 272–277.White D. R. On the analysis of measurement comparisons//Metrologia.2004. V. 41. P. 122–131.White D. R. On the analysis of measurement comparisons//Metrologia.2004. V. 41. P. 122–131.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.